Stretch forming of isotropic materials: Influence of the ratio between yielding in pure shear and uniaxial tension on the stress state

–

Stretch forming of isotropic materials: Influence of the ratio between yielding in pure shear and uniaxial tension on the stress state

REVIL-BAUDARD Benoit, GODOY Hernan, CAZACU Oana

Abstract. The formability of metallic sheets could be assessed by performing a hydraulic bulge test. For isotropic materials, interpretation of the bulge test is usually done using the von Mises yield criterion. F.E. simulations of bulge tests were conducted to study how the specificities of the plastic behavior of an isotropic material influences the strain paths and stress paths experienced during hemispherical and elliptical bulging. In this paper, we investigate the role played by the ratio between the yield stresses in pure shear and uniaxial tension of the material, τ_y \/σ_T on the mechanical behavior during hydraulic bulging. To this end, we make used of the Drucker yield criterion, which can describe the mechanical behavior of isotropic materials with different ratios τ_y \/σ_T with a unique parameter c. For c = 0, the Drucker criterion reduces to the von Mises yield criterion (i.e. τ_y \/σ_T=1\/√3 ) while for c ≠0, it involves dependence on the third invariant of the stress deviator, J_3. Finite element predictions using the yield criterion reveals a correlation between the ratio τ_y \/σ_T which is uniquely defined in terms of the parameter c and the level of plastic strains that develop in the dome, the thickness reduction at the top of the apex, and the strain paths achieved in an elliptical bulge test.

Keywords
Isotropic Material, Bulging, Metal Forming, Stress Path

Published online 4/24/2024, 8 pages
Copyright © 2024 by the author(s)
Published under license by Materials Research Forum LLC., Millersville PA, USA

Citation: REVIL-BAUDARD Benoit, GODOY Hernan, CAZACU Oana, Stretch forming of isotropic materials: Influence of the ratio between yielding in pure shear and uniaxial tension on the stress state, Materials Research Proceedings, Vol. 41, pp 1588-1595, 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21741/9781644903131-176

The article was published as article 176 of the book Material Forming

Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.

References
[1] R. Young, J. Bird, and J. Duncan, “An automated hydraulic bulge tester,” J. Appl. Metalwork., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 11–18, 1981. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02833994
[2] D. Banabic, Formability of metallic materials: plastic anisotropy, formability testing, forming limits. Springer Science & Business Media, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04013-3
[3] P. Mellor, “Stretch forming under fluid pressure,” J. Mech. Phys. Solids, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 41–56, 1956. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(56)90006-0
[4] J. L. Duncan, J. Kolodziejski, and G. Glover, “Bulge Testing as an Aid to Formability Assessment,” in Proc of the 9th Biennial Congress of International Deep Drawing Research Group, 1976.
[5] R. von Mises, “Mechanik der plastischen Formänderung von Kristallen,” ZAMM-J. Appl. Math. Mech. Für Angew. Math. Mech., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 161–185, 1928. https://doi.org/10.1002/zamm.19280080302
[6] O. Cazacu and B. Revil-Baudard, Plasticity of Metallic Materials: Modeling and Applications to Forming. Elsevier, 2020.
[7] D. C. Drucker, The Relation of Experiments to Mathematical Theories of Plasticity. Division of Applied Mathematics, Brown University, 1948.
[8] Abaqus, Abaqus – Version 6.14-1. Dassault Systemes Simulia Corp., Providence, RI, 2014.