Conceptual Design for Uncrewed Combat Aircraft through a Modular Low-Fidelity MDO Workflow
Lorenzo VISCONTI, Giovanni ZIPPA, Paolo BADER
Abstract. An automated Multidisciplinary Design Optimization (MDO) process has been developed to support the conceptual design of uncrewed combat aircraft. This methodology integrates low-fidelity simulations to enable fast design space exploration, facilitating informed trade-offs between key engineering disciplines such as aerodynamics, weight estimation, and propulsion. It was chosen as the validation exercise a typical aircraft configuration for Loyal Wingman class, also in view to explore the design space of baseline configuration reflecting platform as Kratos XQ-58A, Boeing MQ-28, and others, Among the investigated layouts, the V-tail merged as a promising layout, offering maneuverability, scalable payload capacity, and low radar observability.The process architecture foresees to start with the parametric CAD modeling of a conceptual configuration (e.g., V-tail). Geometry is automatically generated through scripting based on modifiable input variables, ensuring real-time synchronization with analytical modules. This tight integration allows for continuous geometry control and significantly reduces iteration time. The overall architecture is modular: each block (aerodynamics, weights, propulsion, etc.) is independent and replaceable, allowing seamless updates or substitutions without disrupting the full system. The workflow can incorporate commercial tools, open-source software, or in-house developments. A key advantage lies in the system’s ability to perform multi-objective optimization via automated Design of Experiments (DoE). Results are evaluated using performance indicators (KPIs), enabling the identification of an optimized baseline configuration consistent with project constraints. Compared to traditional approaches, this solution offers: wide design space exploration in short timeframes, minimal computational requirements (workstation-executable), immediate readiness for configurational multi-objective trade-off analysis and sensitivity mapping. The workflow is structured to feed into high-fidelity design phases, ensuring continuity between conceptual and preliminary design while reducing data loss and transition time.
Keywords
Multidisciplinary Design Optimization (MDO), Plug and Play Architecture, Design of Experiments (DOE), Initial Design Point (IDP), Radar Cross Section (RCS)
Published online 7/20/2026, 6 pages
Copyright © 2026 by the author(s)
Published under license by Materials Research Forum LLC., Millersville PA, USA
Citation: Lorenzo VISCONTI, Giovanni ZIPPA, Paolo BADER, Conceptual Design for Uncrewed Combat Aircraft through a Modular Low-Fidelity MDO Workflow, Materials Research Proceedings, Vol. 69, pp 436-441, 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21741/9781644904251-79
The article was published as article 79 of the book CEAS – AIDAA Conference 2025
Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.
References
[1] K. M. Mull, «Expanded MDO for Effectiveness Based Design Technologies: The EXPEDITE Program and Successes with ESTECO Technologies,» American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., Orlando, FL, 6-10 January 2020. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2020-1390
[2] D. P. Raymer, Aircraft Design: A Conceptual Approach – 6th edition, Reston, Virginia: American Institute of Aeronautics & Astronautics, September 30, 2018.
[3] L. Visconti, «Ottimizzazione multidisciplinare di un velivolo fighter nella fase di progetto preliminare,» Master thesis developed at Leonardo Aeronautics – Aircraft Business Unit, Torino, 2024.
[4] J. R. Martins et A. Ning, Engineering Design Optimization, Cambridge University Press, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108980647
