Breaking the 25% barrier: Evaluating high-volume slag concrete for sustainable UAE infrastructure

Breaking the 25% barrier: Evaluating high-volume slag concrete for sustainable UAE infrastructure

Ahmed Bediwy, Moustafa Basha, Mohamed Mekky, Farah Alnuaimi, Noora Alsayed, Shaikha Rashed

Abstract. As the United Arab Emirates forges ahead with its ambitious 2050 Net-Zero Initiative, a direct response to its national strategy and the UN Paris Agreement, the construction sector faces a critical challenge: decarbonizing one of its most fundamental materials, concrete, without compromising the longevity of its vast infrastructure1. Concrete is the second most consumed material on earth, and its key binder, cement, is responsible for 8–9% of global CO₂ emissions2. The use of Supplementary Cementitious Materials (SCMs), like slag, a byproduct of steel production, is a cornerstone of sustainable concrete design, reducing the carbon footprint and enhancing durability. In alignment with national sustainability goals, the UAE is actively promoting such practices, as outlined in national roadmaps like “Concrete Zero”2. However, a significant regulatory limitation persists, as current specifications often restrict slag content to a maximum of 25% due to concerns over its long-term durability in harsh environments, particularly regarding carbonation3. This precautionary cap, implemented in the absence of conclusive data, potentially limits the full environmental benefits of slag utilization. This research directly addresses this knowledge gap by experimentally investigating the feasibility and performance of concrete mixes incorporating slag content significantly beyond the conventional 25% limit. The primary objective is to comprehensively evaluate the effect of high-volume slag replacement (0%, 25%, 40%) on the key properties of concrete. The experimental program included a full suite of tests to assess fresh properties (workability, air content), mechanical properties (compressive, tensile, flexural, and shear strengths and modulus of elasticity), and durability properties (Abrasion, absorption and electrical resistivity). To interpret macro-scale performance, microstructural analysis using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) were conducted to examine the hydration products and pore structure. The ultimate objective is to establish a scientific foundation for revising the current 25% slag restriction, enabling the UAE construction sector to adopt higher slag volumes without compromising concrete quality. By doing so, the project directly supports the UAE’s climate action goals by facilitating a substantial reduction in the embodied carbon of its future infrastructure.

Keywords
Slag, Decarbonization, Optimization, Sustainability, Infrastructure

Published online 6/20/2026, 8 pages
Copyright © 2026 by the author(s)
Published under license by Materials Research Forum LLC., Millersville PA, USA

Citation: Ahmed Bediwy, Moustafa Basha, Mohamed Mekky, Farah Alnuaimi, Noora Alsayed, Shaikha Rashed, Breaking the 25% barrier: Evaluating high-volume slag concrete for sustainable UAE infrastructure, Materials Research Proceedings, Vol. 67, pp 832-839, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21741/9781644904176-115

The article was published as article 115 of the book Climate Action and Sustainability

Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.

References
[1] ADCEB 2021 “Abu Dhabi economic vision 2030.”
[2] ECC (Environment and Climate Change). (2019). Government of UAE releases emissions projections, showing progress towards climate targets. https://u.ae/en/about-the-uae/strategies-initiatives-and-awards/strategies-plans-and-visions/environment-and-energy/the-uae-net-zero-2050-strategy
[3] Cement and Concrete Association (2022). “Roadmap to Net-Zero Carbon Concrete by 2050”, https://ised-isde.use.ae/site/clean-growth-hub/en/roadmap-net-zero-carbon-concrete-2050.
[4] Cement and Concrete Association (2023). “Concrete Zero”, https: //cement.ca/app/uploads/2023/05/ConcreteZero-Report-FINAL-reduced.pdf.
[5] Government of Fujairah, Mining and minerals, Hajar Mountains. https://fnrc.gov.ae:9044/portal/assets/pdffiles/brouchers/minning_book_en.pdf.
[6] Ghazi, A. B., Jamshidi-Zanjani, A., and Nejati, H. (2022). Utilization of copper mine tailings as a partial substitute for cement in concrete construction. Construction and Building Materials, 317, 125921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125921
[7] Market Research. Challenges to Tackle by the UAE Construction Sector. https://www.researchinuae.com/insight/challenges-to-tackle-by-the-uae-construction-sector
[8] Schuldt, S. J., Jagoda, J. A., Hoisington, A. J., and Delorit, J. D. (2021). A systematic review and analysis of the viability of 3D-printed construction in remote environments. Automation in Construction, 125, 103642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103642
[9] CSA. (2018). “Cementitious materials for use in concrete.” CSA-A3001-13, Canadian Standards 143 Association (CSA), Toronto, ON, Canada.
[10] ASTM, Standard Test Method for Slump of Hydraulic-Cement Concrete, in C143. 2015, ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA.
[11] ASTM, Standard Test Methods for Time of Setting of Hydraulic Cement by Vicat Needle, in C191. 2013, ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA.
[12] ASTM, Standard Test Method for Density, Absorption, and Voids in Hardened Concrete, in C642. 2013, ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA.
[13] ASTM, Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens, in C39. 2015, ASTM: West Conshohocken, PA.
[14] ASTM, Standard Test Method for Splitting Tensile Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens, in C496. 2011, ASTM: West Conshohocken, PA.
[15] ASTM, Standard Test Method for Flexural Strength of Concrete (Using Simple Beam with Third-Point Loading), in C78. 2016, ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA.
[16] CSA. 2019. “Concrete materials and methods of concrete construction / test methods and 147 standard practices for concrete.” CSA A23.1-19/A23.2-19, Canadian Standard Association 148 (CSA), Toronto, ON, Canada.
[17] ASTM C403. 2008. Standard Test Method for Time of Setting of Concrete Mixtures by Penetration Resistance. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 04.02
[18] ASTM, Standard Test Method for Bulk Electrical Conductivity of Hardened Concrete, in C1760. 2012, ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA.