Comparative Evaluation of Model Predictive Control and Field-Oriented Control for PMSM Drives Using a Three-Level NPC Inverter in High-Voltage EV Applications

Comparative Evaluation of Model Predictive Control and Field-Oriented Control for PMSM Drives Using a Three-Level NPC Inverter in High-Voltage EV Applications

Elhassan BOUHAMOU, Merouan BELKASMI, Radouane OULADSINE, Aziz WATIL, Rajesh RAVI, Anteneh WOGASSO, Kamal ANOUNE

Abstract. In electric vehicles (EVs), traction inverters have been widely studied from a topology perspective, modulation, and control strategies. With EV manufacturers adopting higher voltage batteries to take advantage of lower currents, higher power density, and faster charging, this trend has increased interest in multilevel inverters as potential replacements for conventional inverters. Their higher efficiency, better waveform quality, lower stress on semiconductors, and inherent fault tolerance make them attractive for this application. At the same time, advances in automotive ECUs (Electronic Control Units) have made it possible to implement more high computational control strategies, opening the door to predictive control such as Finite-Control-Set Model Predictive Control (FCS-MPC), which leverages direct selection of switching states and offers very fast dynamic response. In this study, a comparative analysis is conducted between classical FCS-MPC and the conventional Field- Oriented Control (FOC) for a PMSM drive supplied by a three-level Neutral Point Clamped (NPC) inverter. The two strategies have been compared in terms of time response and the steady-state error of both torque and speed and the Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) of the stator currents. The results of the simulations prove that FCS- MPC provides faster torque response, while FOC outperforms in terms of precision with lower current distortion. In general, the results highlight advantages and disadvantages of both predictive and conventional control strategies and help clarify which approach may be better suited for next-generation high-voltage EV traction systems.

Keywords
Electric Vehicles, PMSM, Model Predictive Control, Field-Oriented Control, Multilevel Inverters, NPC Inverter, High-Voltage Systems

Published online 4/25/2026, 8 pages
Copyright © 2026 by the author(s)
Published under license by Materials Research Forum LLC., Millersville PA, USA

Citation: Elhassan BOUHAMOU, Merouan BELKASMI, Radouane OULADSINE, Aziz WATIL, Rajesh RAVI, Anteneh WOGASSO, Kamal ANOUNE, Comparative Evaluation of Model Predictive Control and Field-Oriented Control for PMSM Drives Using a Three-Level NPC Inverter in High-Voltage EV Applications, Materials Research Proceedings, Vol. 64, pp 387-394, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21741/9781644904091-48

The article was published as article 48 of the book Energy Futures

Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.

References
[1] A. Poorfakhraei, M. Narimani and A. Emadi,” A Review of Multilevel Inverter Topologies in Electric Vehicles: Current Status and Future Trends,” in IEEE Open Journal of Power Electronics, vol. 2, pp. 155-170, 2021, doi: 10.1109/OJPEL.2021.3063550. https://doi.org/10.1109/OJPEL.2021.3063550
[2] V. Patel, C. Buccella, A. M. Saif, M. Tinari and C. Cecati,” Performance Comparison of Multilevel Inverters for E-transportation,” 2018 International Conference of Electrical and Electronic Technologies for Automotive, Milan, Italy, 2018, pp. 1-6, doi: 10.23919/EETA.2018.8493209. https://doi.org/10.23919/EETA.2018.8493209
[3] Gu, X.; Xu, W.; Zhang, G.; Chen, W.; Jin, X. Three-Level Inverter-PMSM Model Predictive Current Control Based on the Extended Control Set. Electronics 2023, 12, 557. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12030557 https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12030557
[4] P. Pillay and R. Krishnan,” Modeling, simulation, and analysis of permanent-magnet motor drives. I. The permanent-magnet synchronous motor drive,” in IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 265-273, March-April 1989, doi: 10.1109/28.25541. https://doi.org/10.1109/28.25541
[5] P. L. Chavan et al., “Field Oriented Control Technique for PMSM,” in Proceedings of Atlantis Press, 2023. ISBN 978-94-6463-135-7.
[6] T. D. C. Busarello, A. Bubshait, O. V. S. R. Varaprasad, A. Alsaleem and M. G. Simoes,” A Comprehensive Methodology of Field-Oriented Control Design With Parameter Variation Analysis for Interior Permanent Magnet Synchronous Machine Drives,” in IEEE Access, vol. 13, pp. 89524-89541, 2025, doi: 10.1109/AC- CESS.2025.3571610. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3571610
[7] Zhang C, Cen C. Simplified robust two-step model predictive control for permanent magnet synchronous motor. Advances in Mechanical Engineering. 2024;16(5). doi:10.1177/16878132241252334 https://doi.org/10.1177/16878132241252334
[8] S. Hanke, S. Peitz, O. Wallscheid, S. Klus, J. Bocker, and M. Dellnitz, “Koopman Operator-Based Finite- Control-Set Model Predictive Control for Electrical Drives,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.00854, 2018.
[9] H. Yang, Y. Liu, J. Wang and J. Yang,” Improved Multi-step FCS-MPCC with Disturbance Compensation for PMSM Drives,” 2021 IEEE International Conference on Predictive Control of Electrical Drives and Power Electronics (PRECEDE), Jinan, China, 2021, pp. 530-535, doi: 10.1109/PRECEDE51386.2021.9681038. https://doi.org/10.1109/PRECEDE51386.2021.9681038
[10] Priyankar Roy, Atanu Banerjee. A Study on Performance Parameters of Three-Level T-type Inverter based PMSM Drives for Electric Vehicles Applications, 11 July 2022, PREPRINT (Version 1) available at Research Square [https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1814441/v1] https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1814441/v1
[11] Masoud Farhadi, Mehdi Abapour, Mehran Sabahi, Failure analysis and reliability evaluation of modulation techniques for neutral point clamped inverters-A usage model approach, Engineering Failure Analysis, Volume 71, 2017, Pages 90-104, ISSN 1350-6307, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2016.06.010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2016.06.010
[12] B. Urmila and D. Subba Rayudu, “Optimum Space Vector PWM Algorithm for Three-Level Inverter,” ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, vol. 6, no. 9, pp. 24-36, 2011.