Mechanical and Morphological Properties of Rice Husk Ash- Calcium Nitrate Blended Cement Concrete

Mechanical and Morphological Properties of Rice Husk Ash- Calcium Nitrate Blended Cement Concrete

Isaiah Oluwafemi OGUNTOLA, Taofiq BELLO, Caesar Msughter SHAWON, Oludayo Ajani AKINTOLA, Babatunde Emmanuel KOKU-OJOMU

Abstract. Blended cement concrete involves the use of supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) which have gained significant attention in recent years due to its potential to improve various properties of concrete. Rice Husk Ash (RHA) had been used as SCM in concrete and the properties are promising. This study investigates the mechanical and morphological properties of RHA-calcium nitrate (CN) with a view to enhance its properties. RHA was sourced from Hillcrest Rice Mill in Offa, Kwara State. CN was purchased in Osogbo, Osun State. Portland Limestone Cement (PLC), fine and coarse aggregates were purchased in Sango Ota, Ogun State. The chemical composition of RHA, CN and PLC were analyzed using XRF. RHA at 15% and CN at 1,2,3,4 and 5% were replaced by weight of PLC. Two control specimens were established: Control 1 comprised solely of PLC, while Control 2 incorporated RHA without the addition of CN. The compressive strength was assessed from 7 to 90 days of curing. Flexural and splitting tensile strength were evaluated from 7 to 28 days. Morphological evaluation was conducted using scanning electron microscopy. The SiO2, Al2O3 and Fe2O3 present in RHA were 69.32, 3.41 and 2.83%, respectively. The workability (slump and compacting factor) ranged from 14-34 and 0.72-0.84 mm, respectively. The compressive, flexural and splitting tensile strength of RHA-CN concrete varied from 20.84 to 45.8, 1.4 to 4.9 and 1.6 to 2.9 MPa, respectively. The microstructure displayed fewer pores as CN percentage increases. Further studies are recommended to increase the quantity of CN.

Keywords
Rice Hush Ash, Calcium Nitrate, Compressive Strength, Flexural Strength, Splitting Tensile Strength

Published online 4/2/2026, 9 pages
Copyright © 2026 by the author(s)
Published under license by Materials Research Forum LLC., Millersville PA, USA

Citation: Isaiah Oluwafemi OGUNTOLA, Taofiq BELLO, Caesar Msughter SHAWON, Oludayo Ajani AKINTOLA, Babatunde Emmanuel KOKU-OJOMU, Mechanical and Morphological Properties of Rice Husk Ash- Calcium Nitrate Blended Cement Concrete, Materials Research Proceedings, Vol. 63, pp 103-111, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21741/9781644904053-12

The article was published as article 12 of the book Advances in Cement and Concrete Research

Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.

References
[1] A.A. Raheem, A.A. Soyingbe, E. Emenike, Effect of Curing Methods on the Compressive Strength of Concrete with Rice Husk Ash as Admixture, Journal of Sustainable Development, 6(8) (2013) 107–112.
[2] P.K. Mehta, P.J.M. Monteiro, Concrete: Microstructure, Properties, and Materials, fourth ed., McGraw-Hill Education, 2014.
[3] M.D.A. Thomas, M.H. Shehata, S.G. Shashiprakash, Use of Supplementary Cementing Materials in Concrete: Basics, Benefits, and the Influence of Calcium Nitrate on Workability, ACI Materials Journal, 109(6) (2012) 767–776.
[4] D.G. Nair, K.S. Jagadish, A.L.A. Fraaij, Reactive Pozzolanas from Rice Husk Ash: An Alternative to Cement for Rural Housing, Cement and Concrete Research, 36(6) (2006) 1062–1071.
[5] ASTM C618-19, Standard Specification for Coal Fly Ash and Raw or Calcined Natural Pozzolan for Use in Concrete, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2019.
[6] BS EN 197-1, Cement – Part 1: Composition, Specifications and Conformity Criteria for Common Cements, British Standards Institution, London, 2011.
[7] A.A. Raheem, M.A. Kareem, Optimal Raw Material Mix for the Production of Rice Husk Ash Blended Cement, International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering and Technology, 7(2) (2017a).
[8] A.Z. Seyed, A. Farshad, D. Farzan, M. Mojtaba, Rice Husk Ash as a Partial Replacement of Cement in High-Strength Concrete Containing Micro Silica, Case Studies in Construction Materials, 7 (2017) 73–81.
[9] K.O. Oriola, A.A. Raheem, M.A. Kareem, R. Abdulwahab, Assessment of Workability and Compressive Strength of Rice Husk Ash-Blended Palm Kernel Shell Concrete, Journal of Civil and Environmental Studies, 7(1) (2021). https://doi.org/10.36108/laujoces/1202.70.0101
[10] A.A. Raheem, M.A. Kareem, Chemical Composition and Physical Characteristics of Rice Husk Ash Blended Cement, International Journal of Engineering Research Africa, 32 (2017b) 25–35.
[11] R. Swetha, M.S. Rani, U. Raju, Experimental Works on Self-Compacting Concrete by Partial Replacement of Rice Husk Ash Subjected to Acid Attack, International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, 9 (2020) 664–667.
[12] BS 1881-125, Method of Mixing and Sampling Fresh Concrete in the Laboratory, British Standards Institution, London, 2013.
[13] BS EN 12390-3, Testing Hardened Concrete – Compressive Strength of Test Specimens, British Standards Institution, London, 2019.
[14] BS EN 12390-5, Testing Hardened Concrete – Flexural Strength of Test Specimens, British Standards Institution, London, 2019.
[15] BS EN 12390-6, Testing Hardened Concrete – Splitting Tensile Strength of Test Specimens, British Standards Institution, London, 2009.
[16] ASTM C618-21, Standard Specification for Coal Fly Ash and Raw or Calcined Natural Pozzolan for Use in Concrete, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2021.
[17] ASTM C618-12, Standard Specification for Coal Fly Ash and Raw or Calcined Natural Pozzolan for Use in Concrete, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2012.
[18] ASTM D2487, Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2011.
[19] A.A. Raheem, B.D. Ikotun, Incorporation of Agricultural Residues as Partial Substitution for Cement in Concrete and Mortar – A Review, Journal of Building Engineering, 31 (2020) 101428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101428
[20] J.E. Bowles, Engineering Properties of Soils and Their Measurement, fourth ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 1992.
[21] D.C.L. Teo, M.A. Mannan, V.J. Kurian, C. Ganapathy, Lightweight Concrete Made from Oil Palm Shell (OPS): Structural Bond and Durability Properties, Building and Environment, 42 (2007) 2614–2621.
[22] BS EN ISO 10545, Ceramic Tiles – Determination of Water Absorption, Apparent Porosity, Apparent Relative Density and Bulk Density, British Standards Institution, London, 1997.
[23] S. Kazmi, S. Minhaj, S. Abbas, M.J. Munir, A. Khitab, Exploratory Study on the Effect of Waste Rice Husk and Sugarcane Bagasse Ashes in Burnt Clay Bricks, Journal of Building Engineering, 7 (2016) 372–378.
[24] A.M. Neville, Properties of Concrete, fifth ed., Pearson Education, 2011.
[25] ASTM C33/C33M, Standard Specification for Concrete Aggregates, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2018. https://www.astm.org/c0033_c0033m-18.html
[26] E.B. Ogunbode, I.O. Hassan, Effect of Addition of Calcium Nitrate on Selected Properties of Concrete Containing Volcanic Ash, Leonardo Electronic Journal of Practices and Technologies, 19 (2011) 29–38.
[27] A.M. Neville, J.J. Brooks, Concrete Technology, Pearson Education, 2010.
[28] BS ENV 206, Concrete – Performance, Production, Placing and Compliance Criteria, British Standards Institution, London, 1992.
[29] U. Bulham, C.A. Abdulkadir, Analysis of Fly Ash Concrete with Scanning Electron Microscopy and X-Ray Diffraction, Advances in Science and Technology Research Journal, 13(4) (2019) 100–110.