Real-time mental workload assessment with low intrusiveness for assembly processes: Limits and preliminary results
Riccardo GERVASI, Matteo DE MARCHI, Luca MASTROGIACOMO, Dominik T. MATT, Fiorenzo FRANCESCHINI
Abstract. The real-time assessment of mental workload emerges as crucial in Industry 5.0 for optimizing human performance and wellbeing when interacting with complex systems. However, balancing diagnosticity and sensitivity with low intrusiveness in such assessments remains challenging. According to ISO 10075, mental workload is a broad concept encompassing several observable phenomena (e.g., monotony and mental fatigue), each requiring special attention. This paper explores current techniques for real-time assessment of mental workload in manufacturing and presents preliminary results from a case study in an assembly line. The case study integrates physiological metrics (i.e., heart rate variability, electrodermal activity, and eye-tracking) collected by non-invasive biosensors with task performance metrics to highlight benefits and limitations of a low intrusive real-time assessment setup. The need to use more metrics to reliably identify the operator’s psychophysical state is also highlighted.
Keywords
Human Aspects, Monitoring, Quality Engineering
Published online 9/10/2025, 9 pages
Copyright © 2025 by the author(s)
Published under license by Materials Research Forum LLC., Millersville PA, USA
Citation: Riccardo GERVASI, Matteo DE MARCHI, Luca MASTROGIACOMO, Dominik T. MATT, Fiorenzo FRANCESCHINI, Real-time mental workload assessment with low intrusiveness for assembly processes: Limits and preliminary results, Materials Research Proceedings, Vol. 57, pp 47-55, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21741/9781644903735-6
The article was published as article 6 of the book Italian Manufacturing Association Conference
Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.
References
[1] A. Ricci, V. Ronca, R. Capotorto, A. Giorgi, A. Vozzi, D. Germano, G. Borghini, G. Di Flumeri, F. Babiloni, P. Aricò, Understanding the Unexplored: A Review on the Gap in Human Factors Characterization for Industry 5.0, Appl. Sci. 15 (2025) 1822. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15041822
[2] M. Lagomarsino, M. Lorenzini, E. De Momi, A. Ajoudani, An Online Framework for Cognitive Load Assessment in Industrial Tasks, Robot. Comput.-Integr. Manuf. 78 (2022) 102380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2022.102380
[3] M. Capponi, R. Gervasi, L. Mastrogiacomo, F. Franceschini, Assembly complexity and physiological response in human-robot collaboration: Insights from a preliminary experimental analysis, Robot. Comput.-Integr. Manuf. 89 (2024) 102789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2024.102789
[4] ISO 10075-1:2017, Ergonomic principles related to mental workload – Part 1: General issues and concepts, terms and definitions, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, CH, 2017.
[5] D. Tao, H. Tan, H. Wang, X. Zhang, X. Qu, T. Zhang, A Systematic Review of Physiological Measures of Mental Workload, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health 16 (2019) 2716. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16152716
[6] A.K. Raj, M.J. Doyle, J.D. Cameron, Psychophysiology and Performance: Considerations for Human-Centered Design, in: Handb. Hum.-Mach. Interact., CRC Press, 2011.
[7] S. Midha, H.A. Maior, M.L. Wilson, S. Sharples, Measuring Mental Workload Variations in Office Work Tasks using fNIRS, Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 147 (2021) 102580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102580
[8] S. Ma, X. Yan, J. Billington, N. Merat, G. Markkula, Cognitive load during driving: EEG microstate metrics are sensitive to task difficulty and predict safety outcomes, Accid. Anal. Prev. 207 (2024) 107769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2024.107769
[9] R.L. Charles, J. Nixon, Measuring mental workload using physiological measures: A systematic review, Appl. Ergon. 74 (2019) 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2018.08.028
[10] S. Luo, C. Zhang, W. Zhu, H. Chen, J. Yuan, Q. Li, T. Wang, C. Jiang, Noncontact perception for assessing pilot mental workload during the approach and landing under various weather conditions, Signal Image Video Process. 19 (2024) 98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11760-024-03619-x
[11] R. Gervasi, M. Capponi, L. Mastrogiacomo, F. Franceschini, Eye-tracking support for analyzing human factors in human-robot collaboration during repetitive long-duration assembly processes, Prod. Eng. 19 (2025) 47–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-024-01294-y
[12] Ledalab, (n.d.). http://www.ledalab.de/ (accessed June 23, 2021).
[13] S.D. Kreibig, Autonomic nervous system activity in emotion: A review, Biol. Psychol. 84 (2010) 394–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.03.010
[14] S. Delliaux, A. Delaforge, J.-C. Deharo, G. Chaumet, Mental Workload Alters Heart Rate Variability, Lowering Non-linear Dynamics, Front. Physiol. 10 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.00565
