Fostering sustainability-oriented product innovation: A comprehensive framework to support product development for a circular economy
Luigi PANZA, Giulia BRUNO, Paolo CHIABERT
Abstract. Although the Circular Economy (CE) is widely recognized as a fundamental strategy for addressing environmental challenges, its adoption remains limited. A key barrier to its implementation is the lack of effective tools to support product development aligned with CE principles. This study presents a comprehensive framework to support the product development process for a CE. Specifically, a decision tree is employed to quantitatively define product requirements necessary to achieve targeted economic and environmental performance. Design guidelines are then collected through a literature review and allocated to the corresponding phases of product development, enabling practitioners to meet the defined product requirements. By integrating quantitative product requirements with actionable design recommendations, this framework provides a practical tool to align product development with the CE paradigm and drive sustainability-oriented product innovation.
Keywords
Product Development, Product Design, Product Lifecycle, Product Lifecycle Management, Circular Economy
Published online 9/10/2025, 9 pages
Copyright © 2025 by the author(s)
Published under license by Materials Research Forum LLC., Millersville PA, USA
Citation: Luigi PANZA, Giulia BRUNO, Paolo CHIABERT, Fostering sustainability-oriented product innovation: A comprehensive framework to support product development for a circular economy, Materials Research Proceedings, Vol. 57, pp 493-501, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21741/9781644903735-58
The article was published as article 58 of the book Italian Manufacturing Association Conference
Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.
References
[1] M. P. Ciano, M. Peron, L. Panza, and R. Pozzi, “Industry 4.0 technologies in support of circular Economy: A 10R-based integration framework,” Comput. Ind. Eng., no. January, p. 110867, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2025.110867
[2] Y. Ren, K. J. Wu, M. K. Lim, and M. L. Tseng, “Technology transfer adoption to achieve a circular economy model under resource-based view: A high-tech firm,” Int. J. Prod. Econ., vol. 264, no. July, p. 108983, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.108983
[3] CIRCLE Economy, “The Circularity Gap Report 2021,” 2021. https://www.circularity-gap.world/2021
[4] CIRCLE Economy, “THE CIRCULARITY GAP REPORT 2023,” 2023, [Online]. Available: https://www.circularity-gap.world/2023#download
[5] D. Pigosso and T. McAloone, “How can design science contribute to a circular economy? / ICED23: Design in a complex world,” Proc. 21st Int. Conf. Eng. Des. (IDED 17), vol. 5, no. August, pp. 299–307, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://iced.designsociety.org/publication/39752/How+can+design+science+contribute+to+a+circular+economy%3F
[6] C. Sassanelli, A. Urbinati, P. Rosa, D. Chiaroni, and S. Terzi, “Addressing circular economy through design for X approaches: A systematic literature review,” Comput. Ind., vol. 120, p. 103245, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2020.103245
[7] J. X. Wang, H. Burke, and A. Zhang, “Overcoming barriers to circular product design,” Int. J. Prod. Econ., vol. 243, no. July 2020, p. 108346, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108346
[8] L. Panza, A. Faveto, G. Bruno, and F. Lombardi, “Open product development to support circular economy through a material lifecycle management framework,” Int. J. Prod. Lifecycle Manag., vol. 14, no. 2–3, pp. 255–281, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijplm.2022.125826
[9] L. Panza, “Technological Innovations for Sustainable Manufacturing: Concepts, frameworks, and supporting tools,” Politecnico di Torino, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://iris.polito.it/handle/11583/2986280
[10] K. T. Ulrich and S. D. Eppinger, Product Design and Development. McGraw-Hill Education, 2016.
[11] L. Panza and M. Peron, “The role of carbon tax in the transition from a linear economy to a circular economy business model in manufacturing,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 492, no. January, p. 144873, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.144873
[12] A. B. Lopes de Sousa Jabbour et al., “Circular economy business models and operations management,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 235, pp. 1525–1539, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.349
[13] E. M. Lasda Bergman, “Finding Citations to Social Work Literature: The Relative Benefits of Using Web of Science, Scopus, or Google Scholar,” J. Acad. Librariansh., vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 370–379, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2012.08.002
[14] Van Den Berg M.R. and Bakker C.A., “A product design framework for a circular economy,” in Product Lifetimes And The Environment, 2015, pp. 365–379.
[15] A. Teischinger, J. Kalcher, E. Salzger, G. Praxmarer, and M. Vanek, “General systematic for a design for recycling-guideline for wooden windows and wood aluminium windows,” WCTE 2016 – World Conf. Timber Eng., no. August, 2016.
[16] C. Favi, M. Germani, M. Mandolini, and M. Marconi, “DISASSEMBLY KNOWLEDGE CLASSIFICATION AND POTENTIAL APPLICATION: A PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS ON A WASHING MACHINE,” 2016.
[17] M. D. Bovea and V. Pérez-Belis, “Identifying design guidelines to meet the circular economy principles: A case study on electric and electronic equipment,” J. Environ. Manage., vol. 228, no. August, pp. 483–494, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.08.014
[18] B. Pozo Arcos, A. R. Balkenende, C. A. Bakker, and E. Sundin, “Product design for a circular economy: Functional recovery on focus,” Proc. Int. Des. Conf. Des., vol. 6, pp. 2727–2738, 2018. https://doi.org/10.21278/idc.2018.0214
[19] C. Vezzoli, Design for environmental sustainability: Life cycle design of products: Second edition. 2018. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4471-7364-9
[20] S. Shahbazi and A. K. Jönbrink, “Design guidelines to develop circular products: Action research on nordic industry,” Sustain., vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 1–14, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093679
[21] J. K. Albæk, S. Shahbazi, T. C. McAloone, and D. C. A. Pigosso, “Circularity evaluation of alternative concepts during early product design and development,” Sustain., vol. 12, no. 22, pp. 1–25, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229353
[22] J. M. Leal, S. Pompidou, C. Charbuillet, and N. Perry, “Design for and from recycling: A circular ecodesign approach to improve the circular economy,” Sustain., vol. 12, no. 23, pp. 1–30, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12239861
[23] N. Boix Rodríguez, M. Marconi, C. Favi, and G. Formentini, “Eco-design actions to improve life cycle environmental performance of face masks in the pandemic era,” Proc. Des. Soc., vol. 1, no. AUGUST, pp. 1333–1342, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2021.133
[24] S. Willskytt, “Design of consumables in a resource-efficient economy—a literature review,” Sustain., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 1–25, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031036
[25] H. Desing, G. Braun, and R. Hischier, “Resource pressure – A circular design method,” Resour. Conserv. Recycl., vol. 164, no. September 2020, p. 105179, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105179
[26] M. F. Aguiar and D. Jugend, “Circular product design maturity matrix: A guideline to evaluate new product development in light of the circular economy transition,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 365, no. May, p. 132732, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132732
[27] M. R. Munaro and S. F. Tavares, “Design for adaptability and disassembly: guidelines for building deconstruction,” Constr. Innov., 2023. https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-10-2022-0266
[28] J. A. Mesa, “Design for circularity and durability: an integrated approach from DFX guidelines,” Res. Eng. Des., no. iii, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-023-00419-1
[29] A. Kręt-Grześkowiak and M. Baborska-Narożny, “Guidelines for disassembly and adaptation in architectural design compared to circular economy goals – A literature review,” Sustain. Prod. Consum., vol. 39, no. April, pp. 1–12, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2023.04.020
[30] C. L. C. Roxas et al., “Design for Manufacturing and Assembly (DfMA) and Design for Deconstruction (DfD) in the Construction Industry: Challenges, Trends and Developments,” Buildings, vol. 13, no. 5, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13051164
[31] L. Schlesinger, J. Koller, M. Pagels, and F. Döpper, “Alignment of design rules for additive manufacturing and remanufacturing,” J. Remanufacturing, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 99–119, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13243-022-00122-9
[32] S. Willskytt and S. A. Brambila-Macias, “Design guidelines developed from environmental assessments: A design tool for resource-efficient products,” Sustain., vol. 12, no. 12, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12124953
[33] S. Shahbazi, K. Johansen, and E. Sundin, “Product design for automated remanufacturing—a case study of electric and electronic equipment in sweden,” Sustain., vol. 13, no. 16, pp. 1–20, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169039
[34] B. Pozo Arcos, S. Dangal, C. Bakker, J. Faludi, and R. Balkenende, “Faults in consumer products are difficult to diagnose, and design is to blame: A user observation study,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 319, no. August, p. 128741, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128741
[35] A. Zaman, A. M. Caceres Ruiz, S. Shooshtarian, T. Ryley, S. Caldera, and T. Maqsood, “Development of the Circular Economy Design Guidelines for the Australian Built Environment Sector,” Sustain., vol. 15, no. 3, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032500
