Formability analyses during multi-stage SPIF process using optimized ductile fracture locus

Formability analyses during multi-stage SPIF process using optimized ductile fracture locus

Abdul Samad, Shamik Basak

Abstract. Multi-stage single-point incremental forming (MSPIF) is a complicated process requiring specialized methods for predicting formability at fracture inception. Thus, ductile damage criteria are frequently considered essential tools for conceptually assessing formability limitations during the MSPIF process. The current study examined the formability of EDD steel sheets during MSPIF utilizing an uncoupled modified Mohr-Coulomb (MMC) ductile damage model. Furthermore, an attempt was made to calibrate the MMC fracture locus by using the plain strain (PS), shear (SH), and optimized central hole (CH) fracture specimens. It was found that the CH geometry with a 5 mm hole diameter (CHD5) exhibited stress triaxiality and Lode angle parameter values matching with a pure uniaxial tensile stress state. As a result, the CHD5 geometry was regarded as optimal and then used to calibrate the MMC damage model along with the PS and SH geometries. Furthermore, the generated MMC locus was used in a finite element (FE) simulation of the MSPIF process along with the Hill48 anisotropic material model to investigate post-formability behavior. Furthermore, two MSPIF strategies with variations in angle and part depth, namely S1 and S2, were employed to produce the MSPIF cups. It was found that the percentage error in the experimental and numerically anticipated dome height of the MSPIF cups was 7.20% and 4.62% for the S1 and S2 strategies, respectively.

Keywords
Fracture Geometry Optimization, Ductile Damage Modeling, Multi-Stage SPIF

Published online 5/7/2025, 10 pages
Copyright © 2025 by the author(s)
Published under license by Materials Research Forum LLC., Millersville PA, USA

Citation: Abdul Samad, Shamik Basak, Formability analyses during multi-stage SPIF process using optimized ductile fracture locus, Materials Research Proceedings, Vol. 54, pp 1229-1238, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21741/9781644903599-134

The article was published as article 134 of the book Material Forming

Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.

References
[1] Jeswiet, Jack, and D. Young. “Forming limit diagrams for single-point incremental forming of aluminium sheet.” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture 219, no. 4 (2005): 359-364. https://doi.org/10.1243/095440505X32210
[2] Bansal, Ankush, Rakesh Lingam, Sateesh Kumar Yadav, and N. Venkata Reddy. “Prediction of forming forces in single point incremental forming.” Journal of Manufacturing Processes 28 (2017): 486-493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2017.04.016
[3] Hagan, E., and J. Jeswiet. “A review of conventional and modern single-point sheet metal forming methods.” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture 217, no. 2 (2003): 213-225. https://doi.org/10.1243/095440503321148858
[4] Skjoedt, Martin, Maria Beatriz Silva, P. A. F. Martins, and Niels Bay. “Strategies and limits in multi-stage single-point incremental forming.” The journal of strain analysis for engineering design 45, no. 1 (2010): 33-44. https://doi.org/10.1243/03093247JSA574
[5] Malhotra, Rajiv, A. Bhattacharya, A. Kumar, N. V. Reddy, and Jian Cao. “A new methodology for multi-pass single point incremental forming with mixed toolpaths.” CIRP annals 60, no. 1 (2011): 323-326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2011.03.145
[6] Basak, Shamik, K. Sajun Prasad, Ajay M. Sidpara, and Sushanta Kumar Panda. “Single point incremental forming of AA6061 thin sheet: calibration of ductile fracture models incorporating anisotropy and post forming analyses.” International Journal of Material Forming 12 (2019): 623-642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-018-1439-y
[7] Basak, Shamik, Chanyang Kim, Woojin Jeong, Youn Il Jung, and Myoung-Gyu Lee. “Numerical prediction of sheared edge profiles in sheet metal trimming using ductile fracture modeling.” International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 219 (2022): 107109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.107109
[8] Liu, Wenqi, Junhe Lian, and Sebastian Münstermann. “Damage mechanism analysis of a high-strength dual-phase steel sheet with optimized fracture samples for various stress states and loading rates.” Engineering Failure Analysis 106 (2019): 104138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.08.004
[9] Nguyen, Duc-Toan, Jin-Gee Park, and Young-Suk Kim. “Ductile fracture prediction in rotational incremental forming for magnesium alloy sheets using combined kinematic/isotropic hardening model.” Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A 41 (2010): 1983-1994. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-010-0235-1
[10] Said, L. Ben, J. Mars, M. Wali, and F. Dammak. “Numerical prediction of the ductile damage in single point incremental forming process.” International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 131 (2017): 546-558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.08.026
[11] Seyyedi, Seyyed Emad, Hamid Gorji, Mohammad Javad Mirnia, and Mohammad Bakhshi-Jooybari. “Prediction of ductile damage and fracture in the single-and multi-stage incremental hole-flanging processes using a new damage accumulation law.” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 119, no. 7 (2022): 4757-4780. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-08638-3
[12] Mirnia, Mohammad Javad, Mostafa Vahdani, and Mohsen Shamsari. “Ductile damage and deformation mechanics in multi-stage single point incremental forming.” International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 136 (2018): 396-412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.12.051
[13] Li, Zhengfang, Shihong Lu, Tao Zhang, Tianhua Feng, Zhiguo An, and Chengcheng Xue. “Numerical prediction of ductile fracture in multi-stage single point incremental forming based on phenomenological modified Mohr-Coulomb.” Measurement 154 (2020): 107505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2020.107505
[14] Malhotra, Rajiv, A. Bhattacharya, A. Kumar, N. V. Reddy, and Jian Cao. “A new methodology for multi-pass single point incremental forming with mixed toolpaths.” CIRP annals 60, no. 1 (2011): 323-326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2011.03.145