Testbed assessment of wave propagation analysis: Towards scum characterisation in covered anaerobic lagoon
Dat Nha BUI, Thomas KUEN, Shouxun LU, L.R. Francis ROSE, Wing Kong CHIU
Abstract. The assessment of the state and extent of scum conditions under floating covers is crucial for operational management and structural health monitoring of wastewater treatment plants. Advancing beyond our previous research that employed a single accelerometer to examine the covered scum’s frequency response, we propose a more comprehensive approach using wave propagation analysis with an array of sensors to gain a deeper understanding of the complex cover-scum system. Traditional wave propagation analysis applications typically target either large length scale, low-frequency scenarios as seen in seismic surface waves analysis, or small length scale, high-frequency scenarios as observed in ultrasonic guided waves analysis. However, in anticipation of a mid-scale of sub-metre depth and sub-hundred hertz frequency range for early-stage scum in covered anaerobic lagoons, we established a water bladder testbed to evaluate the adaptability of the multi-sensor approach. In this study, we deployed 16 accelerometers on the bladder filled with water to three distinct water levels and used a durometer to gauge the shore hardness. We applied impulse excitations, recorded the wavefields and examined dispersion diagrams. Our findings showed that the wave was dispersive across all tested shore hardness levels, with the phase velocity decreasing as the frequency increased. Notably, a higher shore hardness corresponded to a higher phase velocity which can be clearly differentiated on the dispersion diagrams. By selecting different subsets of accelerometers, we further explore the impact of sensor array length and source offset on the quality of the analysis. Our results confirmed that the sensor array should be sufficiently close to the excitation source to capture high-frequency component information, which attenuates rapidly over distance. For a given number of sensors, optimising the sensor pitch is important to maintain an optimal balance between wavenumber resolution and maximum resolvable wavenumber. These insights could inform the design and deployment of sensor arrays to characterise varying hardness levels of scum. This research offers potential for monitoring and assessing the state of this scum and enhancing our understanding and management of large-scale wastewater treatment lagoons covered with floating covers.
Keywords
Scum, Scum Assessment, Wave Propagation Analysis, Dispersion Characteristics, Anaerobic Lagoon, Wastewater, Wastewater Treatment, Large-Scale Floating Geomembranes
Published online 3/25/2025, 9 pages
Copyright © 2025 by the author(s)
Published under license by Materials Research Forum LLC., Millersville PA, USA
Citation: Dat Nha BUI, Thomas KUEN, Shouxun LU, L.R. Francis ROSE, Wing Kong CHIU, Testbed assessment of wave propagation analysis: Towards scum characterisation in covered anaerobic lagoon, Materials Research Proceedings, Vol. 50, pp 260-268, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21741/9781644903513-30
The article was published as article 30 of the book Structural Health Monitoring
Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.
References
[1] DeGarie, C.J., et al., Floating geomembrane covers for odour control and biogas collection and utilization in municipal lagoons. Water Science and Technology, 2000. 42(10-11): p. 291-298.
[2] Bui, D.N., et al. A Mechanical method of classifying the state of solid matter beneath a floating cover over an anaerobic lagoon. in Materials Research Proceedings. 2023.
[3] Maranò, S., D. Fäh, and Y.M. Lu, Sensor placement for the analysis of seismic surface waves: sources of error, design criterion and array design algorithms. Geophysical Journal International, 2014. 197(3): p. 1566-1581.
[4] Foti, S., et al., Guidelines for the good practice of surface wave analysis: a product of the InterPACIFIC project. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2018. 16(6): p. 2367-2420.
[5] Park, C.B., R.D. Miller, and J. Xia, Multichannel analysis of surface waves. GEOPHYSICS, 1999. 64(3): p. 800-808.
[6] Rahimi, S., C.M. Wood, and D.P. Teague, Performance of Different Transformation Techniques for MASW Data Processing Considering Various Site Conditions, Near-Field Effects, and Modal Separation. Surveys in Geophysics, 2021. 42(5): p. 1197-1225.
[7] Ali, A., et al., Multi-channel analysis of surface waves (MASW) using dispersion and iterative inversion techniques: implications for cavity detection and geotechnical site investigation. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 2021. 80(12): p. 9217-9235.
[8] Rose, J.L., Ultrasonic Guided Waves in Solid Media. 2014, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[9] Yu, L., C.A.C. Leckey, and Z. Tian, Study on crack scattering in aluminum plates with Lamb wave frequency–wavenumber analysis. Smart Materials and Structures, 2013. 22(6): p. 065019.
[10] Tian, Z., et al., Guided wave imaging for detection and evaluation of impact-induced delamination in composites. Smart Materials and Structures, 2015. 24(10): p. 105019.
[11] Foti, S., et al., Surface Wave Methods for Near-Surface Site Characterization. 2014.
