Sustainable public space design: Integrating ecological, economic, and social frameworks in urban environments
Chuloh JUNG, Jamal F. NAYFEH, Nadine FAYAD, Layal Seif EL DINE, Mashael S. AL-AHMADI
Abstract. This paper presents a comprehensive framework for designing sustainable public spaces by integrating ecological, economic, and social sustainability principles. The study employs a mixed-methods approach, combining a theoretical review with spatial analysis, to identify critical spatial implementation items and planning elements that address ecological challenges in urban environments. Using non-linear systems, resource regeneration techniques, and minimizing environmental impact, the study proposes five design types: a recursive design for non-linear systems, wholeness, energy and resource limitations, placemaking, and participation. These design types collectively aim to preserve ecological balance, enhance resource efficiency, and foster social participation and cultural integration. The study’s findings reveal that adopting a holistic and adaptive design approach, which harmonizes ecological, economic, and social dimensions, can significantly contribute to creating resilient and sustainable urban environments. The practical insights provided can assist urban planners in developing public spaces that promote long-term ecological stability and community well-being.
Keywords
Sustainable Public Space Design, Ecological Sustainability, Urban Competitiveness, Social Sustainability, Spatial Implementation
Published online 2/25/2025, 10 pages
Copyright © 2025 by the author(s)
Published under license by Materials Research Forum LLC., Millersville PA, USA
Citation: Chuloh JUNG, Jamal F. NAYFEH, Nadine FAYAD, Layal Seif EL DINE, Mashael S. AL-AHMADI, Sustainable public space design: Integrating ecological, economic, and social frameworks in urban environments, Materials Research Proceedings, Vol. 48, pp 1215-1224, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21741/9781644903414-130
The article was published as article 130 of the book Civil and Environmental Engineering for Resilient, Smart and Sustainable Solutions
Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.
References
[1] Egoreichenko A., Cities of the future: Socio-cultural aspect of urban innovations. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences. (2018) 51. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2018.12.02.171
[2] Smith P, House JI, Bustamante M, Sobocká J, Harper R, Pan G, West PC, Clark JM, Adhya T, Rumpel C, Paustian K. Global change pressures on soils from land use and management. Global change biology. (2016) 22(3):1008-28. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13068
[3] Bueno-Suárez C, Coq-Huelva D. Sustaining what is unsustainable: A review of urban sprawl and urban socio-environmental policies in North America and Western Europe. Sustainability. (2020) 30;12(11):4445. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114445
[4] Allam Z, Jones D. Climate change and economic resilience through urban and cultural heritage: The case of emerging small island developing states economies. Economies. (2019) 21;7(2):62. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies7020062
[5] Liu Y, Gao C, Lu Y. The impact of urbanization on GHG emissions in China: The role of population density. Journal of Cleaner Production. (2017) 20;157:299-309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.138
[6] Connolly C, Keil R, Ali SH. Extended urbanization and the spatialities of infectious disease: Demographic change, infrastructure, and governance. Urban studies. (2021) 58(2):245-63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098020910873
[7] Knox H. Thinking like a climate: Governing a city in times of environmental change. Duke University Press; 2020.
[8] Loughran K. Urban parks and urban problems: A historical perspective on green space development as a cultural fix. Urban Studies. (2020) 57(11):2321-38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098018763555
[9] Ramirez Lopez LJ, Grijalba Castro AI. Sustainability and resilience in smart city planning: A review. Sustainability. (2020) 13(1):181. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010181
[10] Scholtz W, Barnard M. The environment and the Sustainable Development Goals:‘We are on a road to nowhere’. InSustainable Development Goals (2018) (pp. 222-249). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786438768.00017
[11] Zielińska-Dąbkowska K. Healthier and Environmentally Responsible Sustainable Cities and Communities. A New Design Framework and Planning Approach for Urban Illumination. Sustainability. (2022)14:14525. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114525
[12] Al-Kodmany K. Refashioning Cities in the Middle East: The Case of Dubai. International Journal of High-Rise Buildings. (2024) 13(1):11-32. https://doi.org/10.21022/IJHRB.2024.13.1.11
[13] Asif M. Growth and sustainability trends in the buildings sector in the GCC region with particular reference to the KSA and UAE. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. (2016) 55:1267-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.05.042
[14] Koch N. Sustainability spectacle and ‘post-oil’greening initiatives. Environmental politics. (2023) 32(4):708-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2022.2127481
[15] Xiao H. How did Public Buildings and Monuments Contribute to the Evolution of Agora to Forum during the Early Roman Period in Athens?. Journal of Architectural Research and Development. (2021) 5(4):1-8. https://doi.org/10.26689/jard.v5i4.2321
[16] Carmona M. Principles for public space design, planning to do better. Urban Design International. (2019) 24:47-59. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-018-0070-3
[17] Mandeli K. Public space and the challenge of urban transformation in cities of emerging economies: Jeddah case study. Cities. (2019) 95:102409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.102409
[18] Madanipour A. Rethinking public space: between rhetoric and reality. Urban Design International. (2019) 24:38-46. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-019-00087-5
[19] Carmona M. Place value: Place quality and its impact on health, social, economic and environmental outcomes. Journal of urban design. (2019) 24(1):1-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2018.1472523
[20] Culwick C, Patel Z. Building just and sustainable cities through government housing developments. Environment and Urbanization. (2020) 32(1):133-54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247820902661
[21] Bibri SE, Krogstie J. Environmentally data-driven smart sustainable cities: Applied innovative solutions for energy efficiency, pollution reduction, and urban metabolism. Energy Informatics. (2020) 3(1):29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42162-020-00130-8
[22] Hajian M, Kashani SJ. Evolution of the concept of sustainability. From Brundtland Report to sustainable development goals. InSustainable resource management (2021) (pp. 1-24). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-824342-8.00018-3
[23] Bell S, Morse S, editors. Routledge handbook of sustainability indicators. Routledge; 2018.
[24] Heymans A, Breadsell J, Morrison GM, Byrne JJ, Eon C. Ecological urban planning and design: A systematic literature review. Sustainability. (2019) 11(13):3723. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11133723
[25] Mori AS, Lertzman KP, Gustafsson L. Biodiversity and ecosystem services in forest ecosystems: a research agenda for applied forest ecology. Journal of Applied Ecology. (2017) 54(1):12-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12669
[26] Purvis B, Mao Y, Robinson D. Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins. Sustainability science. (2019) 14:681-95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5
