Evaluating virtual reality implementation for risk register identification: A case study of architectural project works

Evaluating virtual reality implementation for risk register identification: A case study of architectural project works

Ryan Faza PRASETYO, Bambang Endro YUWONO, Darmawan PONTAN, RAFLIS, Feby Kartika SARI

Abstract. One of the success factors in project planning is the accuracy of the risk identification process. Traditionally, this process involves experienced individuals to effectively identify risks. However, not all projects have access to experienced resources for efficient risk identification. The implementation of Virtual Reality (VR) has the potential to provide a virtual and spatial experience, allowing users to feel as if they are in the actual field conditions. This study aims to evaluate the application of VR in the risk identification process by assessing the relevance and comparing the risks identified using VR with findings from previous research. The method used involves summarizing responses from participants to determine the dominant risks successfully identified by bring respondent to virtual reality environment that representing real condition of construction site utilizing integration of SketchUp modelling and VR Sketch Software. The research results indicate that the most frequently mentioned risks are related to falling from heights and being struck by materials or other objects on construction projects. These findings align with previous studies, which highlight that falling from heights and being struck by materials are significant risk sources leading to fatalities in construction projects, particularly in Indonesia.

Keywords
Virtual Reality, Risk Register, Risk Identification, Simulation

Published online 2/25/2025, 8 pages
Copyright © 2025 by the author(s)
Published under license by Materials Research Forum LLC., Millersville PA, USA

Citation: Ryan Faza PRASETYO, Bambang Endro YUWONO, Darmawan PONTAN, RAFLIS, Feby Kartika SARI, Evaluating virtual reality implementation for risk register identification: A case study of architectural project works, Materials Research Proceedings, Vol. 48, pp 1171-1178, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21741/9781644903414-125

The article was published as article 125 of the book Civil and Environmental Engineering for Resilient, Smart and Sustainable Solutions

Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.

References
[1] Alvand, A., Mirhosseini, S. M., Ehsanifar, M., Zeighami, E., & Mohammadi, A. (2023). Identification and assessment of risk in construction projects using the integrated FMEA-SWARA-WASPAS model under fuzzy environment: a case study of a construction project in Iran. International Journal of Construction Management, 23(3), 392–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2021.1877875
[2] Bria, T. A., Chen, W. T., Muhammad, M., & Rantelembang, M. B. (2024). Analysis of Fatal Construction Accidents in Indonesia—A Case Study. Buildings, 14(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14041010
[3] Chattapadhyay, D. B., Putta, J., & Rama Mohan Rao, P. (2021). Risk identification, assessments, and prediction for mega construction projects: A risk prediction paradigm based on cross analytical-machine learning model. Buildings, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11040172
[4] Dziadosz, A., & Rejment, M. (2015). Risk Analysis in Construction Project – Chosen Methods. Procedia Engineering, 122(Orsdce), 258–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.10.034
[5] Fang, W., Ma, L., Love, P. E. D., Luo, H., Ding, L., & Zhou, A. (2020). Knowledge graph for identifying hazards on construction sites: Integrating computer vision with ontology. Automation in Construction, 119, 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103310
[6] Fernández, A., Rivera, F. M. La, & Mora-Serrano, J. (2023). Virtual Reality Training for Occupational Risk Prevention: Application Case in Geotechnical Drilling Works. International Journal of Computational Methods and Experimental Measurements, 11(1), 55–63. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijcmem.110107
[7] George, C. (2020). The essence of risk identification in project risk management: An overview. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 9(2), 973–978. https://doi.org/10.21275/SR20215023033
[8] Hafsia, M., Monacelli, E., & Martin, H. (2018). Virtual reality simulator for construction workers. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. https://doi.org/10.1145/3234253.3234298
[9] Hilfert, T., Teizer, J., & König, M. (2016). First person virtual reality for evaluation and learning of construction site safety. ISARC 2016 – 33rd International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction, 4(Isarc), 200–208. https://doi.org/10.22260/isarc2016/0025
[10] Irizarry, J., & Abraham, D. M. (2005). Application of virtual reality technology for the improvement of safety in the steel erection process. Proceedings of the 2005 ASCE International Conference on Computing in Civil Engineering, 1573–1583. https://doi.org/10.1061/40794(179)148
[11] Kumar Mishra, A., Aithal, P. S., Professor, A., & Bhandari Memorial Academy Nepal, M. (2021). Operational Risk Analysis of Common Activities of Building Construction Project. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12(11), 6507–6524.
[12] Lyu, H.-M., Sun, W.-J., Shen, S.-L., & Zhou, A.-N. (2020). Risk Assessment Using a New Consulting Process in Fuzzy AHP. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(3). https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001757
[13] Machfudiyanto, R. A., Sari, T., Rachmawati, N., Laksono, N. B., Soltani, M., & Park, C. (2024). Development of Construction Safety Dashboard Based on Four-Dimensional Building Information Modeling for Fall Prevention : Case Study of Stadium Roof Works.
[14] Osti, F., de Amicis, R., Sanchez, C. A., Tilt, A. B., Prather, E., & Liverani, A. (2021). A VR training system for learning and skills development for construction workers. Virtual Reality, 25(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-020-00470-6
[15] Rosqvist, T. (2003). On the use of expert judgement in the qualification of risk assessment. VTT Publications, 507, 3–48.
[16] Sampaio, A. Z., Ferreira, M. M., Rosário, D. P., & Martins, O. P. (2010). 3D and VR models in Civil Engineering education: Construction, rehabilitation and maintenance. Automation in Construction, 19(7), 819–828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2010.05.006
[17] Sacks, R., Perlman, A., & Barak, R. (2013). Construction safety training using immersive virtual reality. Construction Management and Economics, 31(9), 1005–1017. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2013.828844
[18] Seyman Guray, T., & Kismet, B. (2023). VR and AR in construction management research: bibliometric and descriptive analyses. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 12(3), 635–659. https://doi.org/10.1108/SASBE-01-2022-0015
[19] Subriadi, A. P., & Najwa, N. F. (2020). The consistency analysis of failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) in information technology risk assessment. Heliyon, 6(1), e03161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03161