Solutions for maintenance delays in Saudi oil and gas: Integrating interpretive structure modeling and relative importance index

Solutions for maintenance delays in Saudi oil and gas: Integrating interpretive structure modeling and relative importance index

Adel ALSHIBANI

Abstract. Delay in maintenance and repair of oil and gas plants are crucial issue that require great attention to ensure that activities are conducted as planned. This paper introduces Interpretive Structural Modelling (ISM) based approach to identify and correlate reasons of delay in this type of operations. The potential reasons for delaying schedule of maintenance operations are initially identified through review of the literature and experts’ interview. Then feedback from the targeted professional is gathered via survey questionnaires. The perspective of contractors and owners in the Saudi Arabia Eastern province of are considered. The identified possible reasons are ranked based on the feedback received from a total of 57 respondents. The ISM approach then is employed with the assistance of two experts to explore the correlation among the identified reasons. The relative importance index (RII) revealed that the greatest critical possible reasons for delaying schedule of maintenance operation in oil and gas are material related issues (items spare parts), delivery of spare parts, inexperienced contractor, skill levels and efficiencies of manpower, and unclear scope of work. In contrast, ISM uncovered that the most driving power possible reason for delaying maintenance operations is communication issues followed by site condition and then unclear scope of work.

Keywords
Maintenance, Oil and Gas, ISM, Delay, Experts

Published online 2/25/2025, 12 pages
Copyright © 2025 by the author(s)
Published under license by Materials Research Forum LLC., Millersville PA, USA

Citation: Adel ALSHIBANI, Solutions for maintenance delays in Saudi oil and gas: Integrating interpretive structure modeling and relative importance index, Materials Research Proceedings, Vol. 48, pp 1159-1170, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21741/9781644903414-124

The article was published as article 124 of the book Civil and Environmental Engineering for Resilient, Smart and Sustainable Solutions

Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.

References
[1] A.Kolus, , A. El-Khalifa, U.M. Al-Turki, S.O. Duffuaa, An integrated mathematical model for production scheduling and preventive maintenance planning, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 37(2020) 925-937. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-10-2019-0335 https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-10-2019-0335
[2] M. Bevilacqua, F.E. G. Ciarapica, B. Marchetti, Development of an innovative criticality index for turnaround management in an oil refinery. Int. J. Productivity and Quality Management. 9(2012) 519-544. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPQM.2012.047196
[3] M.A. Kassem, Risk management assessment in oil and gas construction projects using structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Gases. 2 (2022) 33-60. https://doi.org/10.3390/gases2020003. https://doi.org/10.3390/gases2020003
[4] N. Megow, R. H. Möhring, J. Schulz, Decision support and optimization in shutdown and turnaround scheduling, INFORMS, J. Comput, 23(2011) 189-204, doi: 10.1287/ijoc.1100.0393. https://doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.1100.0393
[5] A. R. Alhajri, A. Alshibani, Critical factors behind construction delay in petrochemical projects in Saudi Arabia. Energies. (11) 1652. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11071652. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11071652
[6] A. Alshibani, M. Julaih, A. Adress, O. Alshamrani, F. Almaziad, Identifying and ranking the root causes of schedule delays in oil and gas pipeline construction projects. Energies (16)2023, 283. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16010283. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16010283
[7] H. Abdellatif, A. Alshibani, Major factors causing delay in the delivery of manufacturing and building projects in Saudi Arabia. Buildings. (9)93. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings9040093. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings9040093
[8] M. Ruqaishi, H. A. Bashir, Causes of delay in construction projects in the oil and gas industry in the gulf cooperation council countries: a case study, J. Manag. Eng, (31)2015, 05014017, doi. 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000248. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000248
[9] M. Salama, M A. El Hamid, B. Keogh, Investigating the causes of delay within oil and gas projects in the U.A.E, In: Dainty, A (Ed) Procs 24th Annual ARCOM Conference, (2008)1-3 September, Cardiff, UK, Association of Researchers in Construction Management, 819-827.
[10] M. E. Paté‐Cornell, Learning from the piper alpha accident: A postmortem analysis of technical and organizational factors, Risk Analysis, 13(1993) 215-232, doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1993.tb01071.x. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1993.tb01071.x
[11] N. Safaei, D. Banjevic, A. Jardine, Bi-objective workforce-constrained maintenance scheduling: a case study, J. Oper. Rres. Soc, Taylor & Francis. 62. (2011)1005-1018. doi: 10.1057/jors.2010.51. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2010.51
[12] A. Antonovsky, C. Pollock, and L. Straker, Identification of the human factors contributing to maintenance failures in a petroleum operation, Human Factors, J. Hum. Fact. Ergon. Soci, 56(2014) 306-321, doi: 10.1177/0018720813491424. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720813491424
[13] U. Al-Turki, S. Duffuaa, and M. Bendaya, Trends in turnaround maintenance planning: literature review, J. Qual Maint Eng, (25) 2019, 253-271, doi: 10.1108/JQME-10-2017-0074. https://doi.org/10.1108/JQME-10-2017-0074
[14] S. O. Duffuaa, M. A. Ben Daya, Turnaround maintenance in petrochemical industry: practices and suggested improvements, J. Qual. Maint. Eng, (10)2004, 184-190, https://doi.org/10.1108/13552510410553235. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552510410553235
[15] Z. Mhlanga, E. Munapo, and N. Mavetera, “Investigating reasons of delays and cost escalation in project execution during turnarounds,” Investment Management and Financial Innovations, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 334-348, Jul. 2016, doi: 10.21511/imfi.13(22).2016.08. https://doi.org/10.21511/imfi.13(2-2).2016.08
[16] N. Gunawan, Identification of variables causing delays to turnaround maintenance project. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, (2021), 1098. 022072. 10.1088/1757-899X/1098/2/022072. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1098/2/022072
[17] S. Pokharel, J. (Roger) Jiao, Turn‐around maintenance management in a processing industry, J Qual Maint Eng, (14) 2008,109-122, doi: 10.1108/13552510810877638. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552510810877638
[18] W. Shou, J. Wang, P. Wu, and X. Wang, Lean management framework for improving maintenance operation: development and application in the oil and gas industry, Prod. Plan. Cont.32(2021)585-602, doi: 10.1080/09537287.2020.1744762. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2020.1744762
[19] M. Aoudia, O. Belmokhtar, and G. Zwingelstein, Economic impact of maintenance management ineffectiveness of an oil and gas company, J Qual Maint Eng. 14(2008)237-261, doi: 10.1108/13552510810899454. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552510810899454
[20] D. Alharran, Dr. N. Norazahar, A. Ahmad, N. Bakhary, and N. H. Noh@Seth, The Survey and perspective of human factors associated with maintenance activity, J. Energ. Safet. Tech. 5(2023)61-69, doi: 10.11113/jest.v5n2.119. https://doi.org/10.11113/jest.v5n2.119
[21] S. Durdyev, M. Omarov, S. Ismail. Causes of delay in residential construction projects in Cambodia. Cogent Eng. (4) 2017, 1-12. DOI:10.1080/23311916.2017.1291117. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2017.1291117
[22] M. Naseri, P. Baraldi, M. Compare, and E. Zio, Availability assessment of oil and gas processing plants operating under dynamic Arctic weather conditions, Reliab Eng Syst Saf.152(2016) 66-82, doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2016.03.004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2016.03.004
[23] Y.J. Zidane, J.T. Youcef, Causes of delay and their cures in major Norwegian projects. J. Mod. Proj. Manag. 2018, 5.
[24] S. Wenchi, J. Wang, X. Wang, and H.-Y. Chong, An application of value stream mapping for turnaround maintenance in oil and gas industry: Case study and lessons learned In: Raidén, A B and Aboagye-Nimo, E (Eds) Procs 31st, Annual ARCOM Conference, 7-9 September 2015, Lincoln, UK, Association of Researchers in Construction Management, 813-822.
[25] M. Gündüz, Y. Nielsen, M. Özdemir, Quantification of delay factors using the relative importance index method for construction projects in Turkey. J. Manag. Eng.29(2012) 133-139. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000129
[26] A. N. Al-Marri, S. Nechi, O. Ben-Ayed, and L. Charfeddine, Analysis of the performance of TAM in oil and gas industry: Factors and solutions for improvement, Energy Reports. 6(2020)2276-2287, doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2020.08.012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2020.08.012
[27] M. Tafazzoli, P. P. Shrestha, Investigating causes of delay in U.S. construction projects. 53rd Annual ASC International Conference., Seattle, WA, USA, 5-8 April 2017; pp. 611-621.
[28] I. Muhammad, K. Nadeem, N. Zaheer , A. Bilal , A. Omran. Impact of factors causing delays in original equipment manufacturer (OEM) intensive capital projects, J. Qual. Tech. Manag. 12(2016), 115 – 128.
[29] M.H. Fallahnejad, Delay causes in Iran gas pipeline projects. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 31(2013)136-146. DO – https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.06.003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.06.003
[30] A.S. Ezeldin, M. Abdel-Ghany, Causes of construction delays for engineering projects: An Egyptian perspective. In Proceedings of the AEI 2013: Building Solutions for Architectural Engineering: Proceedings of the 2013 Architectural Engineering National Conference, State College PA, USA, 3-5 April 2013; American Society of Civil Engineers: Reston, VA, USA, 2013; pp. 54-63. doi:10.1061/9780784412909.006. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784412909.006
[31] T. Pourrostam, A. Ismail, Significant factors causing and effects of delay in Iranian construction projects. Aus. J of basic and applied sciences. 5(2011)450-456. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJET.2012.V4.441
[32] J.J. Vaske, J. Beaman, C.C. Sponarski, Rethinking internal consistency in Cronbach’s Alpha, Leisure Sciences. 39 (2016) 1-11. doi :10.1080/01490400.2015.1127189. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2015.1127189
[33] M.N. Juaim, M.A. Hassanain, Assessment of factors influencing the development and implementation of the architectural program, Struct. Surv. 29 (2011) 320-336. https://doi.org/10.1108/02630801111162387. https://doi.org/10.1108/02630801111162387
[34] I. S. Lopes, P. Senra, B. Neto, R. Costa, M. Sousa, T. Cabo, J.A. Oliveira. Multi-Criteria Classification for Prioritization of Preventive Maintenance Tasks to Support Maintenance Scheduling. International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEM.2017.8290263