Evaluation of interlayer bond strength for C55 emulsion prime bituminous binders with aggregates
Samuel ABEJIDE, Reatile PITSO
Abstract. The use of an environmentally and green friendly product for improved interlayer bond strength in recent times has gained interest in the construction industry. This study investigates the performance of the C55 Emulsion Prime when compared with the conventional MC30 prime in enhancing interlayer bond strength and overall adhesion potency with aggregate particles. The C55 Emulsion Prime is a bituminous-based binder designed to penetrate aggregate layers creating a cohesive bond that improves structural integrity and adhesion potency of the binder with aggregates. Through a series of laboratory tests conducted on the two samples, the study provides detailed results on the penetration depth, interlayer bond strength and application under wet conditions. The test results indicated that the C55 emulsion prime significantly enhanced interlayer bond strength with the G1 dolerite aggregate with notable improvement to moisturized or wet surfaces. The C55 Emulsion Prime demonstrates superior interlayer bond strength compared to MC30 Cutback Bitumen Prime in wet regions or when dry aggregate condition is not feasible. The C55 Emulsion prime has a rapid curing rate within 60mins of application to a wet surface making it an efficient protective layer over granular surfaces to adhere and form a good bond strength property with the asphalt layer. This superiority is evident in both the direct shear test, rolling bottle tests, penetration power test and Zeta Potential test making C55 Emulsion Prime a more reliable choice for enhancing pavement performance in accordance with environmental friendliness and climate change sequences. Furthermore, the adhesive strength of the emulsions can be determined by identifying the isoelectric point (IEP). IEP is the pH condition where the surface charge = 0 mV. The IEP of C55 is approximately at pH 4.1. The IEP of the MC30 has been extrapolated to be approximately at pH 2.1. Material where the IEP is at higher pH form the strongest bond because they have a high proton acceptability. It can be predicted that the C55 forms a stronger bond with the aggregate when compared to MC30.
Keywords
Emulsion Prime, Prime Coats, Binders, Adhesion, Interlayer Bond, Zeta Potential, Iso Electric Point, Aggregates
Published online 2/25/2025, 11 pages
Copyright © 2025 by the author(s)
Published under license by Materials Research Forum LLC., Millersville PA, USA
Citation: Samuel ABEJIDE, Reatile PITSO, Evaluation of interlayer bond strength for C55 emulsion prime bituminous binders with aggregates, Materials Research Proceedings, Vol. 48, pp 1075-1085, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21741/9781644903414-116
The article was published as article 116 of the book Civil and Environmental Engineering for Resilient, Smart and Sustainable Solutions
Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.
References
[1] G. Chehab, M. Medeiros, & M. Solaimanian. (2008). “Evaluation of bond performance of Fast Tack Emulsion for Tack Coat applications.” Pennsylvania Department Of Transportation, Report No. FHWA-PA2008-017-PSU021, Pennsylvania Transportation Institute.
[2] Information on http://www.pavementinteractive.org.
[3] Information on http://www.roadscience.net
[4] L. N. Mohammad, M. Elseifi, A. Bae, & N. Patel. (2012). Evaluation of interface bonding between pavement layers. Transportation Research Record, 2296(1), 109-119.
[5] A. Loulizi, I. L, Al-Qadi, & M. A. Elseifi,. (2006). Effectiveness of tack coat in pavement structural performance. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, 75, 1017-1048.
[6] M. I Kumar, Er, Vikas Garg, Er. Zubair & Dr Pooja Sharma, Evaluation of Bond Between Bituminous Pavement Layers, International Journal for Technological Research in Engineering, 11(2), 2019, 5715 – 5719.
[7] A. K. Aditya, A. P. Singh: Assessment of Bond strength between bituminous paving layers: Laboratory Evaluation. ISSN: 2349-5162. Journal of Emerging technologies and innovative research. JETIR2307670, July 2023, Vol 10, Issue 7.
[8] Information available on http://Emulsion Polymer Market Size, Share & Growth Report 2030 (grandviewresearch.com)
[9] J.P Giri, M. Panda and U. Chattaraj. 2013. Interlayer strength of bituminous paving layers – A laboratory case Study. 2nd workshop on Indian water management in 21st century & symposium on sustainable infrastructure development (IWMSID – 2013), IIT Bhubaneswar, Odisha.
[10] L. N, Mohammad, M. Raqib, and B. Huang., Influence of asphalt tack coat materials on interface shear strength., Transportation Research Record 1789.1 (2002): 56-65. https://doi.org/10.3141/1789-06
[11] (SANS 4001-BT4)
[12] EN 13808, 2013 Bitumen and bituminous binders – Framework for specifying cationic bituminous emulsions.
[13] ASTM|D2397_D2397M-20|EN-US Standard Specification for Cationic Emulsified Asphalt.
[14] Information on http://www.EPinternational.com
[15] Jahromi, S. G., & Khodaii, A. (2009). Effects of nanoclay on rheological properties of bitumen binder. Construction and Building Materials, 23(8), 2894-2904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.02.027
[16] J. Read, & D. Whiteoak. (2003). The Shell Bitumen Handbook. Shell Bitumen UK.
[17] N. Thom. (2008). Principles of Pavement Engineering. ICE Publishing.
[18] S. J. Lee, C. K. Akisetty, & S. N. Amirkhanian. (2017). The effect of crumb rubber modifier (CRM) on the performance properties of rubberized binders in HMA pavements. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 20(6), 520-527.
[19] R. N. Hunter, A, Self, & J. Read. (2015). The Shell Bitumen Handbook. ICE Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1680/tsbh.58378
[20] EAPA. (2011). Asphalt in Figures 2011. European Asphalt Pavement Association.
[21] S. R. Shafii, P. Aghajani, & S. Shokrgozar. (2019). Comparative study of the environmental impacts of using recycled concrete as aggregate and limestone in asphalt mixtures. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 146, 130-137.
[22] J. M Krishnan, & K. Rajagopal. (2005). Review of the uses and modeling of bitumen from ancient to modern times. Applied Mechanics Reviews, 58(3), 155-195.
[23] S. T. Muench, K. Willoughby, & N. Anderson. (2016). Greenroads: A sustainability rating system for roadways. Journal of Green Building, 11(1), 93-108.
[24] The SurPASSTM3 device for zeta potential analysis of macroscopic solid surfaces
[25] T. Luxbacher, 2014. The ZETA guide: Principles of the streaming potential technique. Anton Paar GmbH, Austria p. 9-16 (2014).
[26] M.E Labib, A. W. Hefer, & D. N. Little, 2007. Surface Chemistry at the Bitumen-Aggregate Interface. Presented and published. Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Characterisation of Pavement and Soil Engineering Materials, Athens, Greece.
[27] A. W. Hefer, 2004. Adhesion in bitumen-aggregate systems and quantification of the effects of water on the adhesive bond. Texas A&M University.
[28] EN 12697-1. Rolling Bottle Test method. Test methods for hot bituminous conglomerates-Part 11.
[29] B. Nomlala, Z. Mthembu, G. Mturi. and A. Hefer. 2022. Bitumen-aggregate adhesion: A predictive study based on zeta potential analysis using the streaming potential technique. Southern African Transport Conference.
[30] EN 12849:2009 Bitumen and bituminous binders – Determination of penetration power of bituminous emulsions
