–
Effect of different auxetic cell design on the compression behavior of FDMed structures
NAPOLITANO Francesco, CARDENIO Ivano, DEFINA Filippo, MANCO Emanuele, MANZO Alessandro, PAPA Ilaria, RUSSO Pietro
download PDFAbstract. Among the different additive manufacturing technologies for polymeric materials, Fused Deposition Modelling has obtained great visibility and, thanks to the numerous studies on the process conditions, reached high quality of workpiece production. Nevertheless, the slicers are projected to replicate standard and easy to reproduce patterns, which don’t take into account the final use of the workpiece produced. An optimization of the extruded material is represented by the design oriented to support specific loads, which are applied along specific directions. In this research work is proposed the use of auxetic geometry and two different cell types are proposed and compared with the related conventional workpieces, printed with the same volume density. The use of auxetic design allows for differentiation of the load-bearing and to obtain structures which don’t lose their original shape and that can adsorb the compressive energy reaching the compaction which improves the final resistance.
Keywords
Auxetic, Cellular Structures, Compression, Thermoplastic, FDM
Published online 4/24/2024, 10 pages
Copyright © 2024 by the author(s)
Published under license by Materials Research Forum LLC., Millersville PA, USA
Citation: NAPOLITANO Francesco, CARDENIO Ivano, DEFINA Filippo, MANCO Emanuele, MANZO Alessandro, PAPA Ilaria, RUSSO Pietro, Effect of different auxetic cell design on the compression behavior of FDMed structures, Materials Research Proceedings, Vol. 41, pp 2607-2616, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21741/9781644903131-286
The article was published as article 286 of the book Material Forming
Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.
References
[1] V. Birman, G.A. Kardomateas, Review of current trends in research and applications of sandwich structures, Compos. Part B Eng. 142 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.01.027
[2] C. Yang, H.D. Vora, Y. Chang, Behavior of auxetic structures under compression and impact forces, Smart Mater. Struct. 27 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/aaa3cf
[3] O. Duncan, T. Shepherd, C. Moroney, L. Foster, P.D. Venkatraman, K. Winwood, T. Allen, A. Alderson, Review of auxetic materials for sports applications: Expanding options in comfort and protection, Appl. Sci. 8 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/app8060941
[4] T. Li, Y. Chen, X. Hu, Y. Li, L. Wang, Exploiting negative Poisson’s ratio to design 3D-printed composites with enhanced mechanical properties, Mater. Des. 142 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.01.034
[5] K.E. Evans, A. Alderson, Auxetic materials: Functional materials and structures from lateral thinking!, Adv. Mater. 12 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(200005)12:9<617::AID-ADMA617>3.0.CO;2-3
[6] D.J. Gunton, G.A. Saunders, The Young’s modulus and Poisson’s ratio of arsenic, antimony and bismuth, J. Mater. Sci. 7 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00550070
[7] Y. Li, The anisotropic behavior of Poisson’s ratio, Young’s modulus, and shear modulus in hexagonal materials, Phys. Status Solidi 38 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1002/pssa.2210380119
[8] A. Yeganeh-Haeri, D.J. Weidner, J.B. Parise, Elasticity of α-cristobalite: A silicon dioxide with a negative poisson’s ratio, Science (80-. ). 257 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.257.5070.650
[9] L.N.G. F., A Treatise on the Mathematical Theory of Elasticity, Nature 105 (1920). https://doi.org/10.1038/105511a0
[10] R.H. Baughman, J.M. Shacklette, A.A. Zakhidov, S. Stafström, Negative poisson’s ratios as a common feature of cubic metals, Nature 392 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1038/32842
[11] D.R. Veronda, R.A. Westmann, Mechanical characterization of skin-Finite deformations, J. Biomech. 3 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(70)90055-2
[12] L.M. Frolich, M. LaBarbera, W.P. Stevens, Poisson’s ratio of a crossed fibre sheath: the skin of aquatic salamanders, J. Zool. 232 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1994.tb01571.x
[13] C. Lees, J.F.V. Vincent, J.E. Hillerton, Poisson’s ratio in skin, Biomed. Mater. Eng. 1 (1991). https://doi.org/10.3233/BME-1991-1104
[14] J.L. Williams, J.L. Lewis, Properties and an anisotropic model of cancellous bone from the proximal tibial epiphysis, J. Biomech. Eng. 104 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3138303
[15] R. Lakes, Foam structures with a negative poisson’s ratio, Science (80-. ). 235 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.235.4792.1038
[16] A. Alderson, K.L. Alderson, Auxetic materials, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part G J. Aerosp. Eng. 221 (2007) 565–575. https://doi.org/10.1243/09544100JAERO185
[17] H.S. Gill, Mechanical and structure properties of cellular auxetic materials, in: Mater. Today Proc., 2020.
[18] An isotropic three-dimensional structure with Poisson’s ratio =-1, J. Elast. 15 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00042531
[19] A.G. Kolpakov, Determination of the average characteristics of elastic frameworks, J. Appl. Math. Mech. 49 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8928(85)90011-5
[20] A. V. Chentsov, D.S. Lisovenko, Experimental study of auxetic behavior of cellular structure, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 991 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/991/1/012017
[21] D. Li, L. Dong, R.S. Lakes, A unit cell structure with tunable Poisson’s ratio from positive to negative, Mater. Lett. 164 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2015.11.037
[22] Y. Schneider, V. Guski, S. Schmauder, J. Kadkhodapour, J. Hufert, A. Grebhardt, C. Bonten, Deformation Behavior Investigation of Auxetic Structure Made of Poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) Biopolymers Using Finite Element Method, Polymers (Basel). 15 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15071792
[23] H. Cho, D. Seo, D.N. Kim, Mechanics of auxetic materials, in: Handb. Mech. Mater., 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6884-3_25
[24] A. Joseph, V. Mahesh, D. Harursampath, On the application of additive manufacturing methods for auxetic structures: a review, Adv. Manuf. 9 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40436-021-00357-y
[25] S. Hou, T. Li, Z. Jia, L. Wang, Mechanical properties of sandwich composites with 3d-printed auxetic and non-auxetic lattice cores under low velocity impact, Mater. Des. 160 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.11.002
[26] L.J. Gibson, M.F. Ashby, Cellular solids: Structure and properties, second edition, 2014.
[27] ASTM, ASTM C365-03: Standard test method for flatwise compressive properties of sandwich cores, Annu. B. ASTM Stand. (2008).
[28] O. Tolochyna, N. Zgalat-Lozynska, Y. Podrezov, D. Verbylo, O. Tolochyn, O. Zgalat-Lozynskyy, The role of flexible polymer composite materials properties in energy absorption of three-dimensional auxetic lattice structures, Mater. Today Commun. 37 (2023) 107370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.107370
