–
Enhancing interfacial bonding strength in fiber metal laminates through metal surface treatments
LIU Zheng, SIMONETTO Enrico, UMBRELLO Domenico, ROTELLA Giovanna
download PDFAbstract In recent decades, the aircraft industry has experienced a growing need for high-performance, lightweight structures, leading to a significant focus on developing fiber-metal laminates (FMLs). These composites possess various benefits in terms of stiffness, yield stress, fatigue, and high-velocity impact properties due to their hybrid composition. However, certain challenges related to the fabrication, surface treatment, and mechanical properties of these structures require further attention. This paper reviews FML manufacturing with a focus on enhancing the interfacial bonding strength between metal and fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) sheets by conducting different kinds of surface treatment on metal layers to further enhance the FML mechanical properties.
Keywords
Fiber Metal Laminates, Metal Surface Treatment, Interfacial Bonding Strength
Published online 4/24/2024, 8 pages
Copyright © 2024 by the author(s)
Published under license by Materials Research Forum LLC., Millersville PA, USA
Citation: LIU Zheng, SIMONETTO Enrico, UMBRELLO Domenico, ROTELLA Giovanna, Enhancing interfacial bonding strength in fiber metal laminates through metal surface treatments, Materials Research Proceedings, Vol. 41, pp 2057-2064, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21741/9781644903131-227
The article was published as article 227 of the book Material Forming
Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.
References
[1] Sinmazcelik T, Avcu E, Bora MO, Coban O. A review: fibre metal laminates, background, bonding types and applied test methods, Mater. Des. 32 (7) (2011) 3671e3686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2011.03.011
[2] Kazemia ME, Shanmugama L, Yang L, Yang J. A review on the hybrid titanium composite laminates (HTCLs) with focuses on surface treatments, fabrications, and mechanical properties. Composites Part A 128 (2020) 105679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.105679
[3] Sinmazçelik T, Avcu E, Bora MÖ, Çoban O. A Review: Fibre Metal Laminates, Background, Bonding Types and Applied Test Methods. Materials and Design 32 (2011) 3671–3685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2011.03.011
[4] Kim DH, Choi DH, Kim HS. Design optimization of a carbon fiber reinforced composite automotive lower arm. Compos B Eng 58 (2014) 400–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.10.067
[5] Zhu G, Wang Z, Cheng A, Li G. Design optimisation of composite bumper beam with variable cross-sections for automotive vehicle. Int J Crashworthiness 22 (2017) 365–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/13588265.2016.1267552
[6] El-Dessouky HM, Lawrence CA. Ultra-lightweight carbon fibre/thermoplastic composite material using spread tow technology. Compos B Eng 50 (2013) 91–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.01.026
[7] Muflikhun MA, Higuchi R, Yokozeki T, Aoki T. Delamination behavior and energy release rate evaluation of CFRP/SPCC hybrid laminates under ENF test: Corrected with residual thermal stresses. Compos Struct 236 (2020) 111890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.111890
[8] Serubibi A, Hazell P J, Escobedo J P, et al. Fibre-Metal Laminate Structures: High-velocity impact, penetration, and blast loading-A review. Composites Part A 173 (2023) 107674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2023.107674
[9] Doğan MA, Yazman Ş, Gemi L, Yildiz M, Yapici A. A review on drilling of FML stacks with conventional and unconventional processing methods under different conditions. Composite Structures 297 (2022) 115913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115913
[10] Prolongo S, Urena A. Effect of surface pre-treatment on the adhesive strength of epoxy–aluminium joints. Int J Adhes Adhes 29 (2029) 23–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2008.01.001
[11] Chai GB, Manikandan P. Low velocity impact response of fibre-metal laminates–a review. Compos Struct 107 (2014) 363–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.08.003
[12] Burianek DA, Spearing SM. Fatigue damage in titanium-graphite hybrid laminates. Compos Sci Technol 62 (2002) 607–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00027-1
[13] Park SY, Choi WJ, Choi HS, Kwon H. Effects of Surface Pre-treatment and Void Content on GLARE Laminate Process Characteristics. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 210 (2010) 1008–1016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.01.017
[14] Liu Z, Simonetto E, Ghiotti A, Bruschi S. Experimental and numerical investigation of the effect of metal surface treatments on the delamination behaviour of magnesium alloy-based Fibre Metal Laminates. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 38 (2022) 442–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2022.05.015
[15] Kim Y-W. Surface modification of Ti dental implants by grit-blasting and micro-arc oxidation. Mater Manuf Proces 25 (2010) 307–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426911003747915
[16] Silva LFM, Ferreira NMAJ, Richter-Trummer V, Marques ESA. Effect of grooves on the strength of adhesively bonded joints International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives 30 (2010) 735–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2010.07.005
[17] Guo C, He J, Su YH, Lia SH. Thermo-stamping co-curing process for CFRP/steel hybrid sheets and its interface strength improvement Composite Structures 241 (2020) 112108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112108
[18] Gemelli E, Camargo NHA. Low voltage anodization of titanium in nitric acid solution: a new method to bioactivate titanium. Mater Charac 10 (2011) 938–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2011.07.004
[19] He P, Chen K, Yu B, Yue CY, Yang J. Surface microstructures and epoxy bonded shear strength of Ti6Al4V alloy anodized at various temperatures. Compos Sci Technol 82 (2013) 15–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.04.007
[20] He P, Chen K, Yang J. Surface modifications of Ti alloy with tunable hierarchical structures and chemistry for improved metal–polymer interface used in deepwater composite riser. Appl Surf Sci 328 (2015) 614–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.12.081
[21] Man H, Zhao N, Cui Z, Surface morphology of a laser surface nitrided and etched Ti–6Al–4V alloy. Surf Coat Technol 192 (2005) 341–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2004.07.076
[22] Shanmugam L, Kazemi ME, Yang J. Improved bonding strength between thermoplastic resin and Ti alloy with surface treatments by multi-step anodization and singlestep micro-arc oxidation method: a comparative study. ES Mater Manuf 2019;3. https://doi.org/10.30919/esmm5f207
[23] Wang Y, Lei T, Jiang B, Guo L. Growth, microstructure and mechanical properties of microarc oxidation coatings on titanium alloy in phosphate-containing solution. Appl Surf Sci 233 (2004) 258–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2004.03.231
[24] Lin Y, Li H, Wang Q, Gong Z, Tao J. Effect of plasma surface treatment of aluminum alloy sheet on the properties of Al/Gf/PP laminates. Applied Surface Science 507 (2020) 145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.145062
[25] Carradó A. Structural, microstructural, and residual stress investigations of plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite on Ti-6Al-4 V. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2 (2010) 561–5. https://doi.org/10.1021/am900763j
[26] Yu C, Zhu S, Wei D, Wang F. Amorphous sol–gel SiO2 film for protection of Ti6Al4V alloy against high temperature oxidation. Surf Coat Technol. 201(2007) 5967–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2006.11.004
[27] Surowska B, Ostapiuk M, Jakubczak P, Droździel M. The Durability of an Organic–Inorganic Sol– Gel Interlayer in Al-GFRP-CFRP Laminates in a Saline Environment, Mater, 2019. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12152362
[28] Gemelli E, Camargo NHA. Low voltage anodization of titanium in nitric acid solution: a new method to bioactivate titanium. Mater Charact 62 (2011) 938–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2011.07.004
[29] Molitor P, Barron V, Young T. Surface treatment of titanium for adhesive bonding to polymer composites: a review. Int J Adhes Adhes. 21(2001) 129–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-7496(00)00044-0
