An experimental study of effect of printed thickness on the mechanical properties of LPBF produced AlSi10Mg
FAHIMI Pouya, VYSOCHINSKIY Dmitry, KHADYKO Mikhail
download PDFAbstract. Additive manufacturing process allows fabrication of parts with a broad range of sizes with high resolution. This size variation introduces new mechanical properties within the printed component, which creates a significant challenge for the qualification of additively manufactured parts. This unresolved issue hinders the implementation of additive manufacturing in high performance engineering applications. To attain optimal performance of additive components, it is imperative to gain a comprehensive understanding of the size effect. While many studies have explored the mechanical properties and microstructure of additively manufactured AlSi10Mg, the size effect remains relatively undefined. To gain more knowledge on this matter, AlSi10Mg samples with four different thicknesses were fabricated using a selective laser melting machine and tensile tests were performed to characterize the material behavior. Stress-strain curves were derived with consideration of nominal and measured cross section and the resulting diagram showed a considerable difference for the samples with minimum thickness, which was 0.5 mm. Comparing the results between the 2 mm and 0.5 mm thick specimens demonstrated more than 50 percent decrease in tensile properties including ultimate tensile strength and elongation at fracture. Also, the study of strain rate indicated no significant strain rate sensitivity for either thickness. These findings contribute to better understanding the size effects on behavior of printed AlSi10Mg, promoting further commercial adoption of this material.
Keywords
Selective Laser Melting, Size Effect, AlSi10Mg, Metal Additive Manufacturing, Tensile Testing, Powder Bed Fusion
Published online 4/24/2024, 9 pages
Copyright © 2024 by the author(s)
Published under license by Materials Research Forum LLC., Millersville PA, USA
Citation: FAHIMI Pouya, VYSOCHINSKIY Dmitry, KHADYKO Mikhail, An experimental study of effect of printed thickness on the mechanical properties of LPBF produced AlSi10Mg, Materials Research Proceedings, Vol. 41, pp 137-145, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21741/9781644903131-15
The article was published as article 15 of the book Material Forming
Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.
References
[1] X.Y. Cheng, S.J. Li, L.E. Murr, Z.B. Zhang, Y.L. Hao, R. Yang, F. Medina and R.B. Wicker, Compression deformation behavior of Ti-6Al-4V alloy with cellular structures fabricated by electron beam melting, J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 16 (2012) 153-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.10.005
[2] O. Al-Ketan, R. Rowshan and R.K. Abu Al-Rub, Topology-mechanical property relationship of 3D printed strut, skeletal, and sheet based periodic metallic cellular materials, Addit. Manuf. 19 (2018) 167-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2017.12.006
[3] C. Yan, L. Hao, A. Hussein and P. Young, Ti-6Al-4V triply periodic minimal surface structures for bone implants fabricated via selective laser melting, J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 51 (2015) 61-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.06.024
[4] D. Herzog, V. Seyda, E. Wycisk and C. Emmelmann, Additive manufacturing of metals, Acta Mater. 117 (2016) 371-392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2016.07.019
[5] W.E. Frazier, Metal Additive Manufacturing: A Review, J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 23(6) (2014) 1917-1928. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-014-0958-z
[6] B. Blakey-Milner, P. Gradl, G. Snedden, M. Brooks, J. Pitot, E. Lopez, M. Leary, F. Berto and A. du Plessis, Metal additive manufacturing in aerospace: A review, Mater. Des. 209 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2021.110008
[7] S. Cooke, K. Ahmadi, S. Willerth and R. Herring, Metal additive manufacturing: Technology, metallurgy and modelling, J. Manuf. Process. 57 (2020) 978-1003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.07.025
[8] A. Tridello, J. Fiocchi, C.A. Biffi, G. Chiandussi, M. Rossetto, A. Tuissi and D.S. Paolino, Effect of microstructure, residual stresses and building orientation on the fatigue response up to 109 cycles of an SLM AlSi10Mg alloy, Int. J. Fatigue. 137 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105659
[9] C.G. Wang, J.X. Zhu, G.W. Wang, Y. Qin, M.Y. Sun, J.L. Yang, X.F. Shen and S.K. Huang, Effect of building orientation and heat treatment on the anisotropic tensile properties of AlSi10Mg fabricated by selective laser melting, J. Alloys Compd. 895 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.162665
[10] G. Tarakçı, H.M. Khan, M.S. Yılmaz and G. Özer, Effect of building orientations and heat treatments on AlSi10Mg alloy fabricated by selective laser melting: Microstructure evolution, mechanical properties, fracture mechanism and corrosion behavior, Rapid Prototyp. J. 28(8) (2022) 1609-1621. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-11-2021-0325
[11] D. Yue, D. Li, X. Zhang, B. Chen, R. Qin and Z. Wang, Tensile behavior of AlSi10Mg overhanging structures fabricated by laser powder bed fusion: Effects of support structures and build orientation, Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 880 (2023) 145375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2023.145375
[12] M. Aktürk, M. Boy, M.K. Gupta, S. Waqar, G.M. Krolczyk and M.E. Korkmaz, Numerical and experimental investigations of built orientation dependent Johnson–Cook model for selective laser melting manufactured AlSi10Mg, JMR&T. 15 (2021) 6244-6259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.11.062
[13] S. Greco, K. Gutzeit, H. Hotz, B. Kirsch and J.C. Aurich, Selective laser melting (SLM) of AISI 316L—impact of laser power, layer thickness, and hatch spacing on roughness, density, and microhardness at constant input energy density, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 108(5-6) (2020) 1551-1562. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05510-8
[14] R.M. Gouveia, F.J.G. Silva, E. Atzeni, D. Sormaz, J.L. Alves and A.B. Pereira, Effect of Scan Strategies and Use of Support Structures on Surface Quality and Hardness of L-PBF AlSi10Mg Parts, Materials (Basel). 13(10) (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13102248
[15] H. Jia, H. Sun, H. Wang, Y. Wu and H. Wang, Scanning strategy in selective laser melting (SLM): a review, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 113(9-10) (2021) 2413-2435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-06810-3
[16] Z. Dong, X. Zhang, W. Shi, H. Zhou, H. Lei and J. Liang, Study of Size Effect on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of AlSi10Mg Samples Made by Selective Laser Melting, Materials (Basel). 11(12) (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11122463
[17] N. Takata, H. Kodaira, A. Suzuki and M. Kobashi, Size dependence of microstructure of AlSi10Mg alloy fabricated by selective laser melting, Mater. Charact. 143 (2018) 18-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2017.11.052
[18] A.M. Roach, B.C. White, A. Garland, B.H. Jared, J.D. Carroll and B.L. Boyce, Size-dependent stochastic tensile properties in additively manufactured 316L stainless steel, Addit. Manuf. 32 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.101090
[19] D. Barba, C. Alabort, Y.T. Tang, M.J. Viscasillas, R.C. Reed and E. Alabort, On the size and orientation effect in additive manufactured Ti-6Al-4V, Mater. Des. 186 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108235
[20] Information on https://www.tekna.com/
[21] Information on https://www.iso.org/standard/78322.html
[22] Information on https://www.slm-solutions.com
[23] T. Maconachie, M. Leary, J. Zhang, A. Medvedev, A. Sarker, D. Ruan, G. Lu, O. Faruque and M. Brandt, Effect of build orientation on the quasi-static and dynamic response of SLM AlSi10Mg, Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 788 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2020.139445
[24] D. Vysochinskiy and N. Akhtar, On the Influence of Cross-Section Size on Measured Strength of SLM-Produced AlSi10Mg-Alloy, KEM. 926 (2022) 132-140. https://doi.org/10.4028/p-g078sc
