Biodegradable polymers for cosmetic packaging: A technical and life cycle perspective
MIFSUD Sarah, REFALO Paul, ROCHMAN Arif
download PDFAbstract. The packaging industry is a significant contributor to the plastic pollution burdening our environment. One main issue with plastics is that they are designed to be durable, and so they persevere in the environment even after they have fulfilled their use. This study aims to analyse the potential benefits of switching to biodegradable and biobased polymers in the cosmetic packaging industry to lessen their environmental impact once disposed of. This assessment commenced with a sustainable material selection process to shortlist a set of viable biodegradable candidate materials (polylactic acid and wood plastic composites), for cosmetic compacts and then comparing them to acrylonitrile butadiene styrene as the benchmark material for this application. The functional, environmental and cost implications of such a change were quantified to validate the suitability of using biodegradable polymers. Functionally, polylactic acid and acrylonitrile butadiene styrene only passed the testing conducted making wood plastic composites an unviable option. wood plastic composites and polylactic acid were found to cost 40-53 per cent more than acrylonitrile butadiene styrene. In terms of the environmental impact, polylactic acid and wood plastic composites reduced the lifecycle impact by 18-30 per cent and the end-of-life impact by 26-42 per cent. The results obtained suggest great potential in shifting to such an alternative.
Keywords
Biodegradable Polymers, Sustainable Packaging, Life Cycle Assessment
Published online 4/19/2023, 10 pages
Copyright © 2023 by the author(s)
Published under license by Materials Research Forum LLC., Millersville PA, USA
Citation: MIFSUD Sarah, REFALO Paul, ROCHMAN Arif, Biodegradable polymers for cosmetic packaging: A technical and life cycle perspective, Materials Research Proceedings, Vol. 28, pp 2015-2024, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21741/9781644902479-217
The article was published as article 217 of the book Material Forming
Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.
References
[1] J.D. Mittelstaedt, C.J. Shultz, W.E. Kilbourne, M. Peterson, Sustainability as Megatrend: Two Schools of Macromarketing Thought, J. Micromarket. 34 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1177/0276146713520551
[2] Global: natural and organic cosmetics revenue, Statista. Available: https://www.statista.com/forecasts/1264932/worldwide-revenue-natural-organic-cosmetics-market (accessed 01 December 2022).
[3] S. Shafiee, E. Topal, When will fossil fuel reserves be diminished?, Energy Policy 37 (2009) 181–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.08.016
[4] I. Vanderreydt, A. Tenhunen, T. Rommens, L. F. Mortensen, I. Tange, Greenhouse gas emissions and natural capital implications of plastics (including biobased plastics), European Environment Agency, ETC/WMGE 2021/3.
[5] A. Morão, F. de Bie, Life Cycle Impact Assessment of Polylactic Acid (PLA) Produced from Sugarcane in Thailand, J. Polym. Environ. 27 (2019) 2523-2539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-019-01525-9
[6] P. Cinelli, M.B. Coltelli, F. Signori, P. Morganti, A. Lazzeri, Cosmetic Packaging to Save the Environment: Future Perspectives, Cosmetics 6 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/cosmetics6020026
[7] A. Sahota, Sustainability: How the Cosmetics Industry Is Greening Up, New York, John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated, 2014, Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ummt/detail.action?docID =1574356 (accessed 09 May 2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118676516
[8] D. Friedrich, Success factors of Wood-Plastic Composites (WPC) as sustainable packaging material: A cross-sector expert study, Sustainable Prod. Consumpt. 30 (2022) 506-517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.12.030
[9] J. Sebastiao, Application of Life Cycle Engineering in Material Selection: A case study on performance of Biodegradable Polymers in Injection Moulding, 2015.
[10] M.F. Ashby, Materials selection in mechanical design, 4th ed. Burlington, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2011.
[11] SimaPro | LCA software for informed-change makers, SimaPro. https://simapro.com/ (accessed 18 March 2022).
[12] L. Kyllönen, S. Haimi, Novel materials for packaging, FI127576B, Sep. 14, 2018 Available: https://patents.google.com/patent/FI127576B/en, (accessed 10 March 2022).
[13] NatureWorks, Composting, Available: https://www.natureworksllc.com/What-isIngeo/Where-it-Goes/Composting (accessed 10 April 2022).
[14] C. Moretti et al., Cradle-to-grave life cycle assessment of single-use cups made from PLA, PP and PET, Resources, Conservation and Recycling 169 (2021) 105508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105508
[15] Life Cycle Interpretation – an overview, ScienceDirect Topics. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/life-cycleinterpretation (accessed 15 April 2022).
[16] IngeoTM Biopolymer 4043D Technical Data Sheet, NatureWorks (accessed 10 April 2022).
[17] P.H.L. Nguyen, P. Kuruparan, C. Visvanathan, Anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste as a treatment prior to landfill, Bioresource Technol. 98 (2007) 380-387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2005.12.018
