High Strain Rate Behaviour of Auxetic Cellular Structures
Nejc Novak, Matej Vesenjak, Shigeru Tanaka, Kazuyuki Hokamoto, Baoqiao Guo, Pengwan Chen, Zoran Ren
download PDFAbstract. Auxetic cellular structures are modern metamaterials with negative Poisson’s ratio. The auxetic cellular structures build from inverted tetrapods were fabricated and experimentally tested under dynamic loading conditions to evaluate the effect of strain rate on their deformation mode. The Split-Hopkinson Pressure Bar (SHPB) apparatus was used for testing at strain rates up to 1,250 s-1, while a powder gun was used for testing at strain rates up to 5,000 s-1. The homogeneous deformation mode was observed at lower strain rates, while shock deformation mode was predominant at higher rates. The results have shown that the strain rate hardening of analysed auxetic specimens is prominent at higher strain rates when the shock deformation mode is observed, i.e. when most of deformation occurs at the impact front. Relevant computational models in LS-DYNA were developed and validated. A very good correlation between the computational and experimental data was observed.
Keywords
Cellular Structures, Auxetic Materials, High Strain Rate, Experimental Testing, Computational Simulations
Published online 7/30/2019, 6 pages
Copyright © 2019 by the author(s)
Published under license by Materials Research Forum LLC., Millersville PA, USA
Citation: Nejc Novak, Matej Vesenjak, Shigeru Tanaka, Kazuyuki Hokamoto, Baoqiao Guo, Pengwan Chen, Zoran Ren, High Strain Rate Behaviour of Auxetic Cellular Structures, Materials Research Proceedings, Vol. 13, pp 25-30, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21741/9781644900338-4
The article was published as article 4 of the book Explosion Shock Waves and High Strain Rate Phenomena
Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.
References
[1] K. E. Evans, M. A. Nkansah, I. J. Hutchinson, and S. C. Rogers, “Molecular Network Design,” Nature, vol. 353, p. 124, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1038/353124a0
[2] N. Novak, M. Vesenjak, and Z. Ren, “Auxetic cellular materials – a Review,” Strojniški Vestn. – J. Mech. Eng., vol. 62, no. 9, pp. 485–493, 2016. https://doi.org/10.5545/sv-jme.2016.3656
[3] T. Bückmann et al., “Tailored 3D Mechanical Metamaterials Made by Dip-in Direct-Laser-Writing Optical Lithography,” Adv. Mater., vol. 24, no. 20, pp. 2710–2714, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201200584
[4] C. Qi, S. Yang, D. Wang, and L.-J. Yang, “Ballistic resistance of honeycomb sandwich panels under in-plane high-velocity impact,” Sci. World J., vol. 2013, no. SEPTEMBER 2013, p. 892781, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/892781
[5] E. A. Friis, R. S. Lakes, and J. B. Park, “Negative Poisson’s ratio polymeric and metallic foams,” J. Mater. Sci., vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 4406–4414, 1988. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00551939
[6] S. Mohsenizadeh, R. Alipour, M. Shokri Rad, A. Farokhi Nejad, and Z. Ahmad, “Crashworthiness assessment of auxetic foam-filled tube under quasi-static axial loading,” Mater. Des., vol. 88, pp. 258–268, Dec. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.08.152
[7] S. Hou, T. Liu, Z. Zhang, X. Han, and Q. Li, “How does negative Poisson’s ratio of foam filler affect crashworthiness?,” Mater. Des., vol. 82, pp. 247–259, Oct. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.05.050
[8] L. Yang, O. Harrysson, H. West, and D. Cormier, “Compressive properties of Ti–6Al–4V auxetic mesh structures made by electron beam melting,” Acta Mater., vol. 60, no. 8, pp. 3370–3379, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2012.03.015
[9] L. Yang, O. Harrysson, H. West, and D. Cormier, “Mechanical properties of 3D re-entrant honeycomb auxetic structures realized via additive manufacturing,” Int. J. Solids Struct., vol. 69–70, pp. 475–490, Sep. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.05.005
[10] N. Novak, M. Vesenjak, L. Krstulović-Opara, and Z. Ren, “Mechanical characterisation of auxetic cellular structures built from inverted tetrapods,” Compos. Struct., vol. 196, pp. 96–107, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.05.024
[11] T. Fíla et al., “Impact Testing of Polymer-filled Auxetics Using Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar,” Adv. Eng. Mater., p. n/a–n/a, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.201700076
[12] J. Schwerdtfeger, P. Heinl, R. F. Singer, and C. Körner, “Auxetic cellular structures through selective electron beam melting,” Phys. Status Solidi B, vol. 247, no. 2, pp. 269–272, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1002/pssb.200945513
[13] S. Tanaka et al., “High-velocity impact experiment of aluminum foam sample using powder gun,” Meas. J. Int. Meas. Confed., vol. 44, no. 10, pp. 2185–2189, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2011.07.018
[14] N. Novak, K. Hokamoto, M. Vesenjak, and Z. Ren, “Mechanical behaviour of auxetic cellular structures built from inverted tetrapods at high strain rates,” Int. J. Impact Eng., vol. 122, pp. 83–90, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2018.08.001